New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: do not assume that /usr/bin/env exists on macOS #216
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Force-pushed to fix issues reported by |
Not a fan of this. Why not just create or symlink to |
In general, only build directory is writable in sandbox, and a limited set of host directories is readable. While it should be possible to pass /usr/bin/env as an impure derivation dependency, as far as I know, this is usually used only for bootstrapping stdenv, and not in the packages themselves. Note that for Node.js, Alternatively, Nixpkgs can patch shebang lines in |
For example, when building in Nix sandbox, /usr/bin/env is not available. This change also makes gyp tool execution consistent with gyp-win-tool that uses sys.executable on Windows.
@cclauss, hi, are there any updates on this issue? I’d like to move forward with NixOS/nixpkgs#261820 and NixOS/nixpkgs#262124, and ideally I don’t want to apply this patch without getting it merged upstream (see also my previous comment). |
Why not set up |
Sandbox in the Nix term means that only packages built by Nix (which are in |
If a sandbox is going to provide a macOS-like environment, it should provide |
It depends on what you think a build environment should look like.
Both models are valid, tested in practice (165,000 PRs in Homebrew Core, 270,000 PRs in Nixpkgs), and can be used to build a multitude of things. |
This changes fixes build error when
/usr/bin/env
is not available (for example, when building in Nix sandbox). It makes gyp-generated build configurations invoke Python directly on the gyp tools (similar togyp-win-tool
that uses sys.executable on Windows).See also NixOS/nixpkgs#261820 and NixOS/nixpkgs#248708