Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Consider passing the annotation tool output to modules input for more standardization #179

Open
4 tasks
Darcy220606 opened this issue Dec 21, 2022 · 0 comments
Open
4 tasks

Consider passing the annotation tool output to modules input for more standardization #179

Darcy220606 opened this issue Dec 21, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@Darcy220606
Copy link
Contributor

Darcy220606 commented Dec 21, 2022 •
edited

Description of feature

Currently, some modules take in .fna as an input rather than taking in .faa as an input from the annotation tool assigned. This might create diffrerences in the way prediction modules particular covering teh BGC and ARG workflows, because each module runs a different annotation tool. To standardise this more, i would suggest to consider checking the 'BGC and ARG' modules to ensure, if possible, that they take already annotated '.faa' files from the annotation tool.

  • MACREL
  • GECCO
  • DEEPBGC
  • all ARG tools
@Darcy220606 Darcy220606 changed the title Consider passing the annotation tool output to modules Consider passing the annotation tool output to modules input fro more standardisation Dec 21, 2022
@Darcy220606 Darcy220606 changed the title Consider passing the annotation tool output to modules input fro more standardisation Consider passing the annotation tool output to modules input for more standardization Dec 21, 2022
@jfy133 jfy133 added this to the Second Release milestone Dec 23, 2022
@jfy133 jfy133 removed this from the 1.2 - Brazilian Escondidinho milestone Jan 31, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@jfy133 @Darcy220606