Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Skip test feature #999

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: 1.8.x
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

Snorkell
Copy link
Contributor

Description

  • Add a "skipped" flag to test results
  • Add a new microcks property "x-microcks-skip-test: true" for asyn api and open api
  • Let the skipped test marked as success to not make the test suite fails

Related issue(s)

Resolves #998

lbroudoux and others added 2 commits November 17, 2023 14:43
Signed-off-by: Samuel Antoine <samuel.antoine@onem.be>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Antoine <samuel.antoine@onem.be>
Copy link

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity 😴

It will be closed in 30 days if no further activity occurs. To unstale this pull request, add a comment with detailed explanation.

There can be many reasons why some specific pull request has no activity. The most probable cause is lack of time, not lack of interest. Microcks is a Cloud Native Computing Foundation project not owned by a single for-profit company. It is a community-driven initiative ruled under open governance model.

Let us figure out together how to push this pull request forward. Connect with us through one of many communication channels we established here.

Thank you for your patience ❤️

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale State due to inactivity label Jan 10, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot closed this Feb 10, 2024
@lbroudoux lbroudoux reopened this Feb 13, 2024
@lbroudoux lbroudoux added component/tests kind/enhancement keep-open Explicitily keep open help wanted and removed stale State due to inactivity labels Feb 13, 2024
@lbroudoux
Copy link
Member

I'd like to keep on going the discussion on this one. Do you need this in addition or operation selection ability? Do you think it's useful to have this marked at the spec level? Any comments are welcomed!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants