Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bugfix: chargemol runtime directory and os.path.exists fix #3778

Open
wants to merge 14 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

chiang-yuan
Copy link
Contributor

@chiang-yuan chiang-yuan commented Apr 21, 2024

Summary

  • Improve path logic
  • Allow Chargemol to run in different directory (previously the code has implemented but is not working)
  • Fix os.path.isfile bug. Change it into os.path.exists

Todos

  • add test

Checklist

  • Google format doc strings added. Check with ruff.
  • Type annotations included. Check with mypy.
  • Tests added for new features/fixes.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Improved file handling and error checking in the charge calculation module.
    • Renamed instances for clarity and added new test methods for enhanced error handling.
    • Modified assertions and introduced patches for improved structure handling.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 21, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent changes in chargemol_caller.py and related files refine Chargemol script execution, improve error handling for missing files, and enhance overall script robustness. These updates aim to streamline Chargemol analysis and strengthen code reliability.

Changes

File Summary of Changes
.../chargemol_caller.py
.../test_chargemol_caller.py
  • chargemol_caller.py: Added Pathlib import, updated path handling, refined temporary directory management, and enhanced error checks.
  • test_chargemol_caller.py: Renamed instances, added test_missing_exe_error, adjusted assertions, and introduced error handling patch. |

Recent Review Details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between e4ccad6 and 8be153a.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • pymatgen/command_line/chargemol_caller.py (11 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • pymatgen/command_line/chargemol_caller.py

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Member

@janosh janosh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks @chiang-yuan for the os.path.isfile fix! 👍


response = subprocess.run(CHARGEMOL_EXE, capture_output=True, check=False)
_stdout = response.stdout.decode("utf-8")
response.stderr.decode("utf-8")
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

do these two lines serve a purpose? i don't think these raise when response.returncode != 0? i think we need a test for the previously raised RuntimeError

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

maybe we can just use check=True? We don't even need to capture response/stdout here as it is not used?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes, let's use check=True. it's a different error type CalledProcessError which I think is better than RuntimeError anyway but we should still add a test for this behavior.

@janosh janosh added fix Bug fix PRs analysis Concerning pymatgen.analysis charge Electric charge analysis, partitioning, integrations, etc. labels Apr 21, 2024
@janosh janosh added the needs testing PRs that are not ready to merge due to lacking tests label Apr 25, 2024
@chiang-yuan
Copy link
Contributor Author

chiang-yuan commented May 4, 2024

Try to fix the missing command_line in the test file paths but pre-commit keeps failing due to the pyright issue.
I will leave it a bit until the problem is solved globally or just drop the usage of pyright #3777

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
analysis Concerning pymatgen.analysis charge Electric charge analysis, partitioning, integrations, etc. fix Bug fix PRs needs testing PRs that are not ready to merge due to lacking tests
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants