New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hirshfeld Automation #150
Hirshfeld Automation #150
Conversation
Needs ci tests for the new functionality. This is coming soon |
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #150 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 88.23% 88.44% +0.20%
==========================================
Files 80 82 +2
Lines 3265 3340 +75
==========================================
+ Hits 2881 2954 +73
- Misses 384 386 +2
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I left some minor comments. This looks fine to me.
|
||
|
||
def write_hirshfeld(text, natoms, start, outname): | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It would be nice if you could write a docstring for this function. I got confused about the 'start' argument.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Its an internal function that shouldn't really be seen by a user, but I agree that it is currently opaque
A few scripts for automated hirshfeld extraction from FHI-aims.