Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: use monorepo queries #5343

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 24, 2024
Merged

feat: use monorepo queries #5343

merged 1 commit into from
May 24, 2024

Conversation

edgarkhanzadian
Copy link
Contributor

@edgarkhanzadian edgarkhanzadian commented May 3, 2024

Try out Leather build 832434eExtension build, Test report, Storybook, Chromatic

Connected to this PR in monorepo: leather-wallet/mono#113

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented May 13, 2024

Important

Review Skipped

More than 25% of the files skipped due to max files limit. The review is being skipped to prevent a low-quality review.

64 files out of 121 files are above the max files limit of 50. Please upgrade to Pro plan to get higher limits.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@kyranjamie kyranjamie self-requested a review May 20, 2024 13:57
@edgarkhanzadian
Copy link
Contributor Author

This one is ready for review. Fix for failing tests is out for review in monorepo. Once that's merged I'll update the packages and it should fix the failing CI.

Other than that, codewise this PR is ready

@edgarkhanzadian edgarkhanzadian marked this pull request as ready for review May 20, 2024 14:10
@fbwoolf
Copy link
Contributor

fbwoolf commented May 22, 2024

Sorry, I prob just really created a lot of conflicts for you with my last merge. If helps, I can rebase this for you?

@edgarkhanzadian
Copy link
Contributor Author

@fbwoolf nope all good! Merged, thank you!

Copy link
Collaborator

@kyranjamie kyranjamie left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fantastic refactor work @edgarkhanzadian 👏🏼

@@ -1,8 +1,9 @@
import { Inscription } from '@shared/models/inscription.model';
// import { createInscription } from '@leather-wallet/models';
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can these commented out lines be removed?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done!

Copy link
Contributor

@fbwoolf fbwoolf left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🚀

org: GITHUB_ORG,
repo: GITHUB_REPO,
branchName: BRANCH_NAME,
localConfig: localConfig as any,
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We don't need to make this change now, but think the remote config should be separate

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You mean like a separate package or it should be extension specific?

@edgarkhanzadian edgarkhanzadian force-pushed the feat/use-monorepo-queries branch 2 times, most recently from 0735c8e to b5d0805 Compare May 23, 2024 13:05
@edgarkhanzadian edgarkhanzadian added this pull request to the merge queue May 24, 2024
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to a conflict with the base branch May 24, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@pete-watters pete-watters left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great work 🚀

@edgarkhanzadian edgarkhanzadian added this pull request to the merge queue May 24, 2024
Merged via the queue into dev with commit 2f113fc May 24, 2024
28 of 30 checks passed
@edgarkhanzadian edgarkhanzadian deleted the feat/use-monorepo-queries branch May 24, 2024 11:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants