Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump starknet-types-core version + use the lib's poseidon hash #1734

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
May 30, 2024

Conversation

fmoletta
Copy link
Member

@fmoletta fmoletta commented Apr 25, 2024

  • Bumps starknet-types-core to version 0.1.2
  • Uses starknet-types-core's poseidon hash for the PoseidonBuiltinRunner

@fmoletta fmoletta changed the title Bump starknet-types-core to 0.1.1 + use the lib's poseidon Bump starknet-types-core version + use the lib's poseidon hash Apr 25, 2024
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Apr 25, 2024

**Hyper Thereading Benchmark results**




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 1" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=1 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 1" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=1 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 1
  Time (mean ± σ):     27.831 s ±  0.031 s    [User: 27.049 s, System: 0.780 s]
  Range (min … max):   27.809 s … 27.853 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 1
  Time (mean ± σ):     27.067 s ±  0.027 s    [User: 26.259 s, System: 0.806 s]
  Range (min … max):   27.048 s … 27.086 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  'hyper_threading_pr threads: 1' ran
    1.03 ± 0.00 times faster than 'hyper_threading_main threads: 1'




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 2" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=2 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 2" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=2 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 2
  Time (mean ± σ):     15.075 s ±  0.049 s    [User: 27.723 s, System: 0.814 s]
  Range (min … max):   15.041 s … 15.110 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 2
  Time (mean ± σ):     15.099 s ±  0.021 s    [User: 26.910 s, System: 0.794 s]
  Range (min … max):   15.084 s … 15.114 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  'hyper_threading_main threads: 2' ran
    1.00 ± 0.00 times faster than 'hyper_threading_pr threads: 2'




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 4" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=4 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 4" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=4 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 4
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.813 s ±  0.224 s    [User: 38.442 s, System: 0.989 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.655 s … 10.971 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 4
  Time (mean ± σ):     11.331 s ±  0.084 s    [User: 38.243 s, System: 0.958 s]
  Range (min … max):   11.272 s … 11.391 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  'hyper_threading_main threads: 4' ran
    1.05 ± 0.02 times faster than 'hyper_threading_pr threads: 4'




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 6" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=6 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 6" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=6 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 6
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.607 s ±  0.275 s    [User: 39.121 s, System: 1.012 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.412 s … 10.801 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 6
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.896 s ±  0.290 s    [User: 38.231 s, System: 1.015 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.691 s … 11.101 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  'hyper_threading_main threads: 6' ran
    1.03 ± 0.04 times faster than 'hyper_threading_pr threads: 6'




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 8" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=8 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 8" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=8 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 8
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.600 s ±  0.137 s    [User: 39.161 s, System: 1.048 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.503 s … 10.697 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 8
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.489 s ±  0.288 s    [User: 38.687 s, System: 0.979 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.286 s … 10.693 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  'hyper_threading_pr threads: 8' ran
    1.01 ± 0.03 times faster than 'hyper_threading_main threads: 8'




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 16" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=16 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 16" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=16 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 16
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.574 s ±  0.197 s    [User: 39.549 s, System: 1.039 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.435 s … 10.713 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 16
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.409 s ±  0.272 s    [User: 39.024 s, System: 1.058 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.217 s … 10.601 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  'hyper_threading_pr threads: 16' ran
    1.02 ± 0.03 times faster than 'hyper_threading_main threads: 16'


@fmoletta fmoletta marked this pull request as ready for review April 25, 2024 18:37
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 25, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 94.78%. Comparing base (05352b1) to head (1e47295).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Current head 1e47295 differs from pull request most recent head a65b44a

Please upload reports for the commit a65b44a to get more accurate results.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##             main    #1734    +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage   94.78%   94.78%            
========================================
  Files         101      101            
  Lines       39005    38728   -277     
========================================
- Hits        36969    36709   -260     
+ Misses       2036     2019    -17     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Apr 25, 2024

Benchmark Results for unmodified programs 🚀

Command Mean [s] Min [s] Max [s] Relative
base big_factorial 2.102 ± 0.020 2.083 2.141 1.00
head big_factorial 2.110 ± 0.019 2.092 2.144 1.00 ± 0.01
Command Mean [s] Min [s] Max [s] Relative
base big_fibonacci 2.068 ± 0.028 2.027 2.124 1.00 ± 0.02
head big_fibonacci 2.067 ± 0.030 2.036 2.140 1.00
Command Mean [s] Min [s] Max [s] Relative
base blake2s_integration_benchmark 8.098 ± 0.248 7.769 8.668 1.03 ± 0.04
head blake2s_integration_benchmark 7.858 ± 0.125 7.675 8.041 1.00
Command Mean [s] Min [s] Max [s] Relative
base compare_arrays_200000 2.205 ± 0.031 2.172 2.248 1.00 ± 0.02
head compare_arrays_200000 2.204 ± 0.033 2.164 2.256 1.00
Command Mean [s] Min [s] Max [s] Relative
base dict_integration_benchmark 1.443 ± 0.010 1.428 1.459 1.00
head dict_integration_benchmark 1.453 ± 0.008 1.438 1.464 1.01 ± 0.01
Command Mean [s] Min [s] Max [s] Relative
base field_arithmetic_get_square_benchmark 1.335 ± 0.027 1.302 1.380 1.07 ± 0.03
head field_arithmetic_get_square_benchmark 1.245 ± 0.018 1.224 1.279 1.00
Command Mean [s] Min [s] Max [s] Relative
base integration_builtins 7.888 ± 0.180 7.705 8.232 1.00 ± 0.03
head integration_builtins 7.883 ± 0.101 7.733 8.018 1.00
Command Mean [s] Min [s] Max [s] Relative
base keccak_integration_benchmark 8.345 ± 0.145 8.075 8.464 1.03 ± 0.03
head keccak_integration_benchmark 8.123 ± 0.204 7.898 8.498 1.00
Command Mean [s] Min [s] Max [s] Relative
base linear_search 2.173 ± 0.024 2.121 2.214 1.01 ± 0.02
head linear_search 2.147 ± 0.021 2.120 2.194 1.00
Command Mean [s] Min [s] Max [s] Relative
base math_cmp_and_pow_integration_benchmark 1.731 ± 0.009 1.713 1.743 1.17 ± 0.02
head math_cmp_and_pow_integration_benchmark 1.482 ± 0.021 1.466 1.538 1.00
Command Mean [s] Min [s] Max [s] Relative
base math_integration_benchmark 1.633 ± 0.011 1.621 1.655 1.11 ± 0.01
head math_integration_benchmark 1.478 ± 0.013 1.463 1.509 1.00
Command Mean [s] Min [s] Max [s] Relative
base memory_integration_benchmark 1.225 ± 0.007 1.215 1.234 1.00
head memory_integration_benchmark 1.229 ± 0.008 1.219 1.246 1.00 ± 0.01
Command Mean [s] Min [s] Max [s] Relative
base operations_with_data_structures_benchmarks 1.873 ± 0.055 1.835 2.023 1.19 ± 0.04
head operations_with_data_structures_benchmarks 1.572 ± 0.022 1.552 1.628 1.00
Command Mean [ms] Min [ms] Max [ms] Relative
base pedersen 529.8 ± 6.1 522.4 541.3 1.00
head pedersen 530.6 ± 7.8 522.7 544.2 1.00 ± 0.02
Command Mean [ms] Min [ms] Max [ms] Relative
base poseidon_integration_benchmark 984.6 ± 3.4 981.8 993.4 1.29 ± 0.01
head poseidon_integration_benchmark 763.0 ± 4.7 756.8 772.4 1.00
Command Mean [s] Min [s] Max [s] Relative
base secp_integration_benchmark 1.901 ± 0.014 1.878 1.918 1.03 ± 0.01
head secp_integration_benchmark 1.851 ± 0.017 1.835 1.879 1.00
Command Mean [ms] Min [ms] Max [ms] Relative
base set_integration_benchmark 654.7 ± 4.4 647.2 664.4 1.00
head set_integration_benchmark 675.6 ± 3.6 669.2 680.6 1.03 ± 0.01
Command Mean [s] Min [s] Max [s] Relative
base uint256_integration_benchmark 4.416 ± 0.092 4.262 4.567 1.00
head uint256_integration_benchmark 4.473 ± 0.232 4.319 5.021 1.01 ± 0.06

@Oppen
Copy link
Member

Oppen commented Apr 25, 2024

image

Not good.

@fmoletta fmoletta marked this pull request as draft April 26, 2024 13:59
@fmoletta fmoletta changed the title Bump starknet-types-core version + use the lib's poseidon hash [On Hold] Bump starknet-types-core version + use the lib's poseidon hash Apr 26, 2024
@pefontana
Copy link
Member

pefontana commented Apr 26, 2024

image Not good.

Yes, we should wait the types-rs update
starknet-io/types-rs#64

And see the results

@fmoletta fmoletta changed the title [On Hold] Bump starknet-types-core version + use the lib's poseidon hash Bump starknet-types-core version + use the lib's poseidon hash May 29, 2024
@fmoletta fmoletta marked this pull request as ready for review May 29, 2024 19:15
@Oppen Oppen added this pull request to the merge queue May 29, 2024
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks May 29, 2024
@fmoletta fmoletta enabled auto-merge May 30, 2024 14:12
@fmoletta fmoletta added this pull request to the merge queue May 30, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit 0f4cfc2 May 30, 2024
69 of 70 checks passed
@fmoletta fmoletta deleted the use-types-rs-poseidon branch May 30, 2024 14:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants