Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[occm] add tag on floating ip create #2577

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

lidongshengxdayu
Copy link

What this PR does / why we need it:

In some scenarios, tags are used as resource tags, but occm creates a floating ip without a tag. This PR adds the same tag as the LB when the floating ip created.

Add tag same as LB for floating ip create

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. label Apr 18, 2024
Copy link

linux-foundation-easycla bot commented Apr 18, 2024

CLA Signed

The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. label Apr 18, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @lidongshengxdayu!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes/cloud-provider-openstack 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes/cloud-provider-openstack has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Apr 18, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @lidongshengxdayu. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Apr 18, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign fengyunpan2 for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. and removed cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. labels Apr 18, 2024
err = attributestags.Add(lbaas.network, "floatingips", floatIP.ID, *tag).ExtractErr()
err = PreserveGopherError(err)
if mc.ObserveRequest(err) != nil {
floatingips.Delete(lbaas.network, floatIP.ID)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not really sure a failure to add a tag should be fatal and cause a full rollback. This most likely won't work either. I'd rather have the code follow K8s reconciling principles and make it fetch the FIP, check if tag exists and if not, add it. This would also handle the upgrade situations, so that after upgrade all FIPs without tags would get one.

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

sure ,this is indeed not very clean. Now it is modified to check the tag when confirming the floating ip. If it does not exist, it will be added to the floating ip.

@dulek
Copy link
Contributor

dulek commented Apr 24, 2024

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Apr 24, 2024
@dulek
Copy link
Contributor

dulek commented Apr 24, 2024

This looks like a sane request to be able to tag the FIPs created by CCM. This needs to handle one more case though:

loadbalancer.openstack.org/keep-floatingip annotation will force CCM to not delete the FIP. In such two cases we should untag the FIP.

While you're on this, be informed that a bunch of other folks are working on resource tagging, @stephenfin and @dd-georgiev.

Copy link
Contributor

@dulek dulek left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is still not untagging FIPs we don't delete properly.

@lidongshengxdayu
Copy link
Author

This is still not untagging FIPs we don't delete properly.

it mean that you need to untag it when cancel the association?

@dulek
Copy link
Contributor

dulek commented Apr 26, 2024

See this comment for details: #2577 (comment)

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Apr 26, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants