New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[gwctl] Expand the output of gwctl describe httproute #3071
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
[gwctl] Expand the output of gwctl describe httproute #3071
Conversation
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: tdn21 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Welcome @tdn21! |
Hi @tdn21. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
/assign Thanks @tdn21, this seems to be shaping up well. Will do a more detailed review once we take care of the clarifications provided in #3037 (comment) Thanks for contributing! |
Hi @tdn21! Did you get a chance to make the necessary updates? |
PR needs rebase. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
@gauravkghildiyal, sincere apologies for not getting to this last week. I will update the PR this weekend. Thank you for your patience. 🙇 |
What type of PR is this?
/kind gep
What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR introduces an expansion in the output of gwctl describe httproute/httproutes as per the expectation of this GEP.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #3037
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: