Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(#56): delete range of tasks #58

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

rjoydip-zz
Copy link

@rjoydip-zz rjoydip-zz commented Aug 4, 2018

This PR solved #56.

Delete a range of tasks

For Example: tb -d 1-5 or tb -d 1-5 7 9-11

@klaudiosinani klaudiosinani self-requested a review August 7, 2018 16:19
@klaudiosinani klaudiosinani added the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 7, 2018
Copy link

@kalexmills kalexmills left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm


_generateNumbers(value) {
let _start = value[0] || null;
let _end = value[1] || null;

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should this still work if the user inputs taskbook -d 1-5-10?
Looks like it will currently just include 1-5, but maybe an error should be returned, or 1-10 should be used instead?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You should use 1-10 instead of taskbook -d 1-5-10. That's more logical

[_start, _end] = [_end, _start];
}

for (let i = parseInt(_start, 10); i <= parseInt(_end, 10); i++) {

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You use parseInt on both start and end twice, why not assign this one time and reuse?

}

_produceNumbers(values) {
return [...new Set(this._flattenDown(values.map(value => value.indexOf('-') > -1 ? this._generateNumbers(value.split('-')) : value), []))];

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I personally think that this line looks more complex than it really should be in the first look.
Why not improve this function to actually iterate in the values and generate a new array directly?
This way you will not need to flatten the array afterwards.

return result;
}

_generateNumbers(value) {

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe rename to _generateNumbersFromInterval

Suggested change
_generateNumbers(value) {
_generateNumbersFromInterval(value) {

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants