Lower coverage thresholds for system tests. #79
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The only lines not covered are not specifying a port at all when running juttle-engine (which doesn't match our use of getFreePort) and daemonizing, which we don't want to handle.
|
#80 so we can bump coverage back up |
|
+1 the RED on here was due to the examples tests not checking the containres are up and shall be fixed in this PR where I have a nice way of handling the wait: #76 |
mstemm
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 10, 2016
Lower coverage thresholds for system tests.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The only lines not covered are not specifying a port at all when
running juttle-engine (which doesn't match our use of getFreePort) and
daemonizing, which we don't want to handle.
@rlgomes