Print the full func name (and path) in the debug MIR #572
+439
−445
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Print the full func name (and path) in the debug MIR.
The function name itself is not enough for readability. We can elide well-known items, such as things in the
std
prelude, but that's not what wasn't done, and I'm not sure how difficult it is to do that.This reverts part of the changes in 7e31053, which I had missed (7e31053#r935146145).
That change changed things like this:
to this:
which is IMO a lot less readable.
What we want is
since
Vec
is in thestd
prelude.Since I'm not sure how easy it is to do that prelude elision (I know
rustc
recently added this), this reverts those changes.