Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

temorary solution for #518 #525

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

aaaaargZombies
Copy link

Hello, I'm new to Haskell and exploring the ecosystem. Sorry to see the site for this project was down and the reasons why.

A suggested temporary solution to #518 that still points people to the written resources and recommendations for talks.

I understand this is more than a practical issue for those involved in the project so if this is not the way you'd like to go just close the PR.

Copy link
Member

@moodmosaic moodmosaic left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you! That’s an interesting idea and definitely better than a 404. Probably we can merge this, as a temporary fix.

Perhaps a long term solution can be hosting the contents of hedgehog.qa website on GitHub Pages. This assumes that there’s a way to reliably (and in full) fetch the content from web.archive.org, which I’ve never tried.

Copy link
Member

@moodmosaic moodmosaic left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the PR. I'm reconsidering the use of a web archive link, as it might not be ideal for an active project.

As an alternative, we could temporarily remove the hedgehog.qa link from the README.md entirely. We could handle this in two steps in our git history:

  1. Replace the current link with the web archive version. (This PR)
  2. Remove the link altogether. (Can be in this PR, too.)

This method allows us to keep a record of the changes and potentially add a new link later when we transition to GitHub Pages.

I would appreciate your thoughts and any other suggestions on this approach.

cc: @sol @ocharles @ysangkok @ChickenProp @endgame @ploeh

@sol
Copy link
Contributor

sol commented May 11, 2024

Migrating to GitHub pages sounds good to me: #526

@ChickenProp
Copy link
Contributor

I think github pages is the ideal solution, but an archive link is better than no link or a broken link. It definitely looks weird for an active project, but a brief footnote explaining it would make it less weird.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants