Workload's labels isn't following the recommendation of labels from Kubernetes.

[JhoLee]

tl;dr
Suggesting Harbor Helm Chart to follow the [Kubernetes Labels Recommendation](backward compatibility).

---

I'm using Harbor and many apps with helm.
And I use their kubernetes labels usefully like;

1. Collecting metrics with Prometheus.
2. Managing workloads.

But I knew that Harbor Helm has not follwed Kubernetes' label recommendation.
(More information)

So I suggest Harbor to follow this recommendation.
Or I will commit it by myself, and I'll request for review.

Thank you.

[ninjadq]

Hi @JhoLee , thank you for mention this, could you help to commit a PR to add this label to harbor-helm, we already have some similar labels but not follow the k8s recommendation, you should keep them and add the new ones. Because some user may depend those labels in production

[JhoLee]

@ninjadq OK. I'll commit it with backward compatibility.

[JhoLee]

@ninjadq I committed those labels with backward compatibility!

[martinnirtl]

Hello!! Any update on this?

[billabongrob]

Yeah, curious as well. Seems like none of the deployments or statefulsets inherit any of these labels. 😢