-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 44
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
An implementation of coupled bcs. #460
Draft
cianwilson
wants to merge
7
commits into
geodynamics:main
Choose a base branch
from
cianwilson:coupled_bcs
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Draft
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Think this can actually be reimplemented in a considerably simpler way but I would like to add a test to this version first. This may break current tests as it changes the default boundary condition logic (it is no longer possible to just set the bc type based on what it is not because there are more than two types of bc now).
cianwilson
commented
Jun 13, 2023
cianwilson
commented
Jun 13, 2023
This allows generic scalar fields to be output which have a length of at least 5 (not just 4).
This may break tests that rely on the old defaults.
This just runs for 2 timesteps and checks that the shell slices produced match the expected values on 2 coupled fields (1 temperature, 1 chi, both coupled to another chi).
cianwilson
commented
Jun 15, 2023
src/Physics/BoundaryConditions.F90
Outdated
Real*8 :: dTdr_chi_coeff_bottom(1:n_scalar_max) = 0.0d0 | ||
Real*8 :: dTdr_dchidr_coeff_bottom(1:n_scalar_max) = 0.0d0 | ||
Real*8 :: dTdr_T_coeff_bottom = 0.0d0 | ||
|
||
Real*8 :: chi_a_Bottom(1:n_scalar_max) = 1.0d0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
missed this
Need to set this up to restore the old defaults if no other bc is set |
But unclear what to do about the default values.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is currently just a draft PR! Please do not merge.
I think this initial implementation can actually be reimplemented in a considerably simpler way but I would like to add a test to this version first.
This may break current tests as it changes the default boundary condition logic (it is no longer possible to just set the bc type based on what it is not because there are more than two types of bc now).