Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add new dataset: GermanGovServiceRetrieval #731

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
May 17, 2024

Conversation

malteos
Copy link
Contributor

@malteos malteos commented May 15, 2024

GermanGovServiceRetrieval: LHM-Dienstleistungen-QA is a German question answering dataset for government services of the Munich city administration. It associates questions with a textual context containing the answer

Checklist for adding MMTEB dataset

Reason for dataset addition: Domain-specific retrieval dataset for German

  • I have tested that the dataset runs with the mteb package.
  • I have run the following models on the task (adding the results to the pr). These can be run using the mteb run -m {model_name} -t {task_name} command.
    • sentence-transformers/paraphrase-multilingual-MiniLM-L12-v2
    • intfloat/multilingual-e5-small
  • I have checked that the performance is neither trivial (both models gain close to perfect scores) nor random (both models gain close to random scores).
  • If the dataset is too big (e.g. >2048 examples), considering using self.stratified_subsampling() under dataset_transform()
  • I have filled out the metadata object in the dataset file (find documentation on it here).
  • Run tests locally to make sure nothing is broken using make test.
  • Run the formatter to format the code using make lint.
  • I have added points for my submission to the points folder using the PR number as the filename (e.g. 438.jsonl).

@malteos
Copy link
Contributor Author

malteos commented May 15, 2024

Do you have time to review? @guenthermi @Muennighoff @PhilipMay

Copy link
Contributor

@KennethEnevoldsen KennethEnevoldsen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think everything looks good. Feel free to add points. You might also consider using ndcg_5 instead of 10 since the dataset is quite small.

@malteos
Copy link
Contributor Author

malteos commented May 15, 2024

I think everything looks good. Feel free to add points. You might also consider using ndcg_5 instead of 10 since the dataset is quite small.

Good point. I changed the main metric.

@PhilipMay
Copy link

PhilipMay commented May 17, 2024

Do you have time to review? @guenthermi @Muennighoff @PhilipMay

Hey @malteos . I have almost no knowledge with MTEB. Never implemented anything here. Sorry.
Maybe @rasdani could have a look?

Copy link
Contributor

@KennethEnevoldsen KennethEnevoldsen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Have enabled auto-merge and updated the points. Let me know if you disagree. Thanks for the addition!

docs/mmteb/points/731.jsonl Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@KennethEnevoldsen KennethEnevoldsen enabled auto-merge (squash) May 17, 2024 08:38
@KennethEnevoldsen KennethEnevoldsen merged commit 66792ef into embeddings-benchmark:main May 17, 2024
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants