Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve the default value of centaur-tabs-excluded-prefixes #220

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 17, 2024

Conversation

erikmd
Copy link
Contributor

@erikmd erikmd commented Aug 26, 2023

Dear @ema2159,

Thanks for maintaining this very nice mode! (BTW, I recently added it in the init file we propose to CS students.)

Just a small PR to propose two changes regarding centaur-tabs-excluded-prefixes that looked important to me → cf. the commits' messages

(and the following screenshot that deals with the first commit)

Screenshot before this PR: we cannot see the suggestions if the ispell buffer has only one line

2023-08-26_22-06-56_Screenshot_ispell

@erikmd
Copy link
Contributor Author

erikmd commented Aug 26, 2023

FYI I've just amended my first commit to add another useful prefix…

indeed, the following special buffers have a minimal size and are then
not centaur-tabs compatible:

- *Choices* for (ispell-word)
- *Process List* for (list-processes)
- *Calculator*, *Calc Trail* for (calc-dispatch)
Indeed:

- as help-mode and helpful-mode buffers are expected to be "regular" buffers
- all the more as they are part of the doc of `centaur-tabs-buffer-groups`:
  https://github.com/ema2159/centaur-tabs/blob/0bb1aa18d475319df85f192dce3327802866c3c3/README.org?plain=1#L234-L236
@erikmd erikmd changed the title Fix excluded buffers Improve the default value of centaur-tabs-excluded-prefixes Sep 25, 2023
@erikmd
Copy link
Contributor Author

erikmd commented May 16, 2024

Hi @jcs090218 ! what's your opinion on this PR? it should be an easy one.

Kind regards.

@jcs090218
Copy link
Collaborator

Thank you for the changes! :)

@jcs090218 jcs090218 merged commit 56e28a7 into ema2159:master May 17, 2024
@erikmd erikmd deleted the fix-excluded-buffers branch May 17, 2024 10:48
@erikmd
Copy link
Contributor Author

erikmd commented May 17, 2024

Thank you for your time and for the merge! :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants