-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 59
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Change IUT to Implementation Under Test #366
Change IUT to Implementation Under Test #366
Conversation
Diff of schemas and yaml
|
Thanks @magnusbaeck for your handy script https://github.com/magnusbaeck/eiffel/blob/diff/diff_defs.py |
- Use tox instead - Add more comments - Place all first for default
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Everything looks fine, but would you mind ripping out the makefile patch to a separate PR? It's clearly unrelated to the IUT stuff.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think it's entirely obvious that we have to issue new event versions for this change. We're not changing the data schema nor any event semantics. Where do we draw the line between typo corrections (that I think we can agree shouldn't warrant new event versions) and this change?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree with Magnus on his last comment. I don't think we need to step the event versions here.
I wouldn't expect any event producer/consumer to change anything to abide to the changes in this PR, since I believe item under test
and implementation under test
are semantically equivalent. I might be wrong in that statement though, and if we can identify a semantic difference between the two terms, that might force users of Eiffel to change how they use the IUT links then I can accept that we step the event versions.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Approving this as-is, since it was decided on the latest Eiffel TC meeting that any change to the protocol yaml file should result in stepped event versions.
https://github.com/eiffel-community/community/blob/master/meetings/MEETINGS_TC_2023.md#aug-17-2023
Applicable Issues
Fixes #359
Description of the Change
Changed Item Under Test to Implementation Under Test in
Alternate Designs
None
Benefits
As explained in #359 ETSI defines IUT as Implementation Under Test and we should use standard nomenclature.
Possible Drawbacks
None that I can think off
Sign-off
Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.1
By making a contribution to this project, I certify that:
(a) The contribution was created in whole or in part by me and I
have the right to submit it under the open source license
indicated in the file; or
(b) The contribution is based upon previous work that, to the best
of my knowledge, is covered under an appropriate open source
license and I have the right under that license to submit that
work with modifications, whether created in whole or in part
by me, under the same open source license (unless I am
permitted to submit under a different license), as indicated
in the file; or
(c) The contribution was provided directly to me by some other
person who certified (a), (b) or (c) and I have not modified
it.
(d) I understand and agree that this project and the contribution
are public and that a record of the contribution (including all
personal information I submit with it, including my sign-off) is
maintained indefinitely and may be redistributed consistent with
this project or the open source license(s) involved.
Signed-off-by: Mattias Linnér mattias.liner@gmail.com