Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[bugfix] Fix ignored namespace binding conflict #4507

Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

chris-evolvedbinary
Copy link
Contributor

Description:

Add error when namespace binding conflict occurs.

Reference:

#1482

Type of tests:

Existing tests still work.


This open source contribution to the eXist-db project was commissioned by the Office of the Historian, U.S. Department of State, https://history.state.gov/.

@sonarcloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Jul 27, 2022

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 1 Code Smell

100.0% 100.0% Coverage
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

Copy link
Member

@dizzzz dizzzz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please add a (set of) test(s) as provided in the nice original problem report.

Copy link
Member

@line-o line-o left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good but I do not see any tests for it. I would prefer them to be XQSuite tests.

Copy link
Member

@adamretter adamretter left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have just attempted the test in the linked issue. Unfortunately it shows that this is not the correct solution to the problem. We cannot statically detect this at compile time as this PR attempts to do, the issue we are trying to solve can only be detected at runtime.

@line-o
Copy link
Member

line-o commented Feb 21, 2023

Can we close this PR, @adamretter? The linked issue is closed.

@duncdrum duncdrum added the awaiting-response requires additional information from submitter label Apr 7, 2023
@duncdrum
Copy link
Contributor

duncdrum commented Apr 7, 2023

As this is not the right fix, and there are pending change request I’ll convert this to draft

@duncdrum duncdrum marked this pull request as draft April 7, 2023 20:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
awaiting-response requires additional information from submitter
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants