Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature/integrate helm solver #2067

Open
wants to merge 12 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

vogt31337
Copy link
Contributor

Hi,

I've created a PR which enables the use of the HELM method for pandapower. For this to function HELMPy needs to be installed. At the moment a modified Version must be used (this one here HELMPy), this version returns more values, for example if the method did converge and how many pade approximations needed to be done to reach the target accuracy.

BR

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 6, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 22.34% and project coverage change: -0.21 ⚠️

Comparison is base (70071d2) 78.86% compared to head (580546d) 78.66%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #2067      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    78.86%   78.66%   -0.21%     
===========================================
  Files          213      214       +1     
  Lines        26541    26634      +93     
===========================================
+ Hits         20932    20952      +20     
- Misses        5609     5682      +73     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
pandapower/run.py 95.28% <ø> (ø)
pandapower/pf/run_helmpy_pf.py 17.64% <17.64%> (ø)
pandapower/powerflow.py 96.03% <33.33%> (-1.53%) ⬇️
pandapower/auxiliary.py 83.59% <83.33%> (-0.03%) ⬇️

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@rbolgaryn
Copy link
Member

I think there should be more tests for this implementation

@rbolgaryn
Copy link
Member

Furthermore, documentation and CHANGELOG should be extended.

Copy link
Member

@rbolgaryn rbolgaryn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

see comments above

@vogt31337
Copy link
Contributor Author

still some bugs, for some networks results match, for others results don't match. I'm not sure why atm. Will investigate further.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants