Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update vulnerable dependency: com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind #100

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

JavaEcosystemStudy
Copy link

Hi! We spot a vulnerable dependency in your project, which might threaten your software. We also found another project that uses the same vulnerable dependency in a similar way as you did, and they have upgraded the dependency. We, thus, believe that your project is highly possible to be affected by this vulnerability similarly. The following shows the detailed information.

Vulnerability description

  • CVE: CVE-2019-16943
  • Vulnerable dependency: com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind:2.9.8
  • Vulnerable function: com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.JavaType:isEnumType()
  • Invocation Path:
uk.gov.dstl.baleen.consumers.LocationElasticsearch:doProcess(org.apache.uima.jcas.JCas)
 ⬇️ 
com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ObjectMapper:readValue(java.lang.String,java.lang.Class)
 ⬇️ 
...
 ⬇️ 
com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.JavaType:isEnumType()

Upgrade example

Another project also used the same dependency with a similar invocation path, and they have taken actions to resolve this issue.

com.visionarts.powerjambda.actions.JsonBodyActionRequestReader:readRequest(com.visionarts.powerjambda.AwsProxyRequest)
 ⬇️ 
com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ObjectMapper:readValue(java.lang.String,java.lang.Class)
 ⬇️ 
...
 ⬇️ 
com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.JavaType:isEnumType()

Therefore, you might also need to upgrade this dependency. Hope this can help you! 😄

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant