xService - Add recovery options properties

[RandomNoun7]

Pull Request (PR) description

Implements the ability to manage service Failure Actions via the registry.

This change will add additional properties to the xService resource to specify reboot message, failure command, and all three of the Failure Actions.

This Pull Request (PR) fixes the following issues

• Fixes xService Cannot Manage Failure Actions #678

Task list

• Added an entry to the change log under the Unreleased section of the
  file CHANGELOG.md. Entry should say what was changed and how that
  affects users (if applicable), and reference the issue being resolved
  (if applicable).
• Resource documentation added/updated in README.md.
• Resource parameter descriptions added/updated in README.md, schema.mof
  and comment-based help.
• Comment-based help added/updated.
• Localization strings added/updated in all localization files as appropriate.
• Examples appropriately added/updated.
• Unit tests added/updated. See DSC Community Testing Guidelines.
• Integration tests added/updated (where possible). See DSC Community Testing Guidelines.
• New/changed code adheres to DSC Community Style Guidelines.

---

This change is 

[RandomNoun7]

This PR is a draft at the moment to give anyone interested a chance to see where the code is going so far and a chance to comment.

Currently only Get-TargetResource and Test-TargetResource are working.

Still to do:

• Set-TargetResource
• Unit Testing
• Acceptance Testing
• Evaluate byte conversion methods to see if something cleaner can be found
• Refactor the code into seperate files possibly to aid in readability and maintainability
• Update MOF Files
• Update documentation and examples

[RandomNoun7]

Refactored the byte parsing to use [System.BitConverter]::ToInt32(byte[]) instead of a bunch of string conversion.

I also discovered that while the UI will only represent up to three failure actions, you can specify as many as you want if you create a service in C# or if you set the failure actions using sc.exe. I also found that if the last action in the actions array is to take no action at all, the output of sc.exe qfailure will not show you that action in the output, but it is still present and will be honored in the binary data in the registry key.

The behavior is that for whichever failure you are currently experiencing N, the action N-1 will be taken, unless that is out of bounds of the array, in wich case the last action present in the array will be selected and executed. In the case of an array with a final action of taking no action, it seems that the service will attempt corrective action N-1 times, but thereafter, for the final action, will simply give up and not bother to restart the computer, or even the service itself.

As an example this appears to be the default behavior for the WSearch service, which has 6 actions specified, 5 of which restart the service, and the sixth which does nothing at all.

To account for fact that the number of failure actions cannot be known ahead of time, I have had to implement the collection of failure actions to manage as a collection of objects called FailureActionsCollection. The idea is that the user can specify the list of failure actions as an array of hash tables with the keys type and delaySeconds, and the code in the Test-TargetResource and Set-TargetResource commands should be able to iterate over the collection and ensure each action is properly reflected in the registry key data.

[Outek]

Actualy we are also interested in this configuration(in our case for a SQL service). If you like to have some assistance, just ping me.

[RandomNoun7]

The Set-Target functionality is nearly complete. However, in the course of testing I found another registry key that I need to manage.

In the Recovery tab of a services properties dialog, there is a check box labeled Enable Actions For Stops With Errors. It turns out that this check box corresponds to a registry key called FailureActionsOnNonCrashFailures. The key stores the boolean value represented by the struct documented here.

This is a very important key to manage because the value of that key makes a critical difference to the recovery behavior of a service.

By default this key does not exist. It is only created when the check box is ticked.

I will have to add a parameter for this value to all of the functions.

[PlagueHO]

Hi @RandomNoun7 - is this one still progressing? Would be great to get it in.

[RandomNoun7]

@PlagueHO I would like to get started making progress again in the next week or so. Are you targeting a release date to get this in?

[PlagueHO]

Hi @RandomNoun7 - as soon as this goes in I can release it. We've adopted a continuous delivery model so we can immediately release any significant new features or bugs. For breaking changes or high risk/impact changes we might leave the module in preview for a bit and release it a month after.