Fix duplicate files #2275
Open
Fix duplicate files #2275
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
tinngo56
changed the title
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Regarding this issue, this fix addresses the problem of duplicate files being created when they are dragged and dropped into the dropzone. This behavior is not desired as the user will already have the file after dropping it into the dropzone and does not require duplicates. Additionally, since the same file may be used frequently, creating duplicates is unnecessary.
To prevent duplicate files from being added to the dropzone, we check for the presence of another file with the same name and size. This process ensures that only unique files are accepted. By conducting this check, we can maintain the integrity of the files and avoid any possible errors.
Validation: A local test HTML page was created to replicate the issue. With the applied fix, the error did not recur, confirming the effectiveness of the solution.
Looking forward to any feedback or questions about this implementation.