Regarding #109 #111
Open
Regarding #109 #111
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
@dpryan79 so I tried to implement #109 (also related to #86 ) and kind of failed half-way.
The option --NoMeCpG is a modification of CpG option to ignore the CGC contexts (since it conflicts with GC methylation). It works and output looks correct on IGV.
The option --GCH is supposed to be combined with --noCpG to get only GCH methylation. I tried to make it work at least in combination with --cytosine_report but the output file is always empty even if that line I added is being evaluated in the function
writeBlank. I think it need more modifications in theextractCallsfunction? But maybe there are other places where CG- context is always assumed? I am confused 馃槗I am just going to leave it here. Maybe you can help to make it work if you have time..
Best,
Vivek