JitArm64: Skip temp regs where possible #12764
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
JosJuice
reviewed
May 4, 2024
added 5 commits
May 7, 2024 21:11
Sintendo
force-pushed
the
jitarm64-temp-regs
branch
from
4eff5c6
to
b63808a
Compare
JosJuice
approved these changes
May 7, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There were several places in the code where we allocate a scratch register to temporarily hold a value. However, when the destination register is never read, we may use it as a scratch register and skip explicitly allocating one.
This should reduce register pressure a little.