Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: add more tests #1079

Open
wants to merge 12 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

chore: add more tests #1079

wants to merge 12 commits into from

Conversation

ephraimduncan
Copy link
Collaborator

Testing Performed

  • Test to create a document with multiple recipients with different roles
  • Test to create a document and send a copy
  • Test to send a document and sign with a custom date format
  • Test to sign a document and approve with approver

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 5, 2024

Important

Review Skipped

Auto reviews are limited to the following labels: coderabbit. Please add one of these labels to enable auto reviews.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Walkthrough

The recent update focuses on enhancing document flow within an application, specifically targeting the document handling process. It introduces new functionalities and tests for document creation, approval, and signing with added complexity, such as multiple recipients and custom dates. Additionally, a server-side function for retrieving document fields by email has been added, alongside a minor UI update for testing purposes.

Changes

File(s) Summary
.../stepper-component.spec.ts Enhanced document handling tests with new imports, additional fields and roles in seed functions, and tests for document creation, approval, and signing.
.../server-only/field/get-field-by-email.ts Added a new function getFieldByEmail to retrieve document fields by email using Prisma.
.../components/field/field.tsx Added a data-testid attribute to <div> in FieldContainerPortal for testing, marked as TODO for removal.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Apr 5, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
prd-marketing 🔄 Building (Inspect) Visit Preview May 23, 2024 7:51am
stg-app ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback May 23, 2024 7:51am
stg-docs ❌ Failed (Inspect) May 23, 2024 7:51am
stg-marketing ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback May 23, 2024 7:51am
1 Ignored Deployment
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
prd-app ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) May 23, 2024 7:51am

@documenso documenso deleted a comment from github-actions bot Apr 8, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

packages/lib/server-only/field/get-field-by-email.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

🚨 @ephraimduncan has 4 pull requests awaiting review. Please consider reviewing them when possible. 🚨

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants