Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

doc: Allow asciidoc again #542

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

thesamesam
Copy link
Contributor

This effectively reverts 0e63843 and 173319e.

asciidoc has been revived (for a while now) and doesn't require Python 2. We still prefer asciidoctor and fallback to asciidoc/a2x if it's not available.

Comparing the asciidoc and asciidoctor man pages, everything looks OK.

Python tends to be available more readily in distribution build environments rather than the Ruby stack. Also, the pregenerated man pages are gone as of f132c94.

This effectively reverts 0e63843 and
173319e.

asciidoc has been revived (for a while now) and doesn't require Python 2. We
still prefer asciidoctor and fallback to asciidoc/a2x if it's not available.

Comparing the asciidoc and asciidoctor man pages, everything looks OK.

Python tends to be available more readily in distribution build environments
rather than the Ruby stack. Also, the pregenerated man pages are gone as of
f132c94.

Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
@digint
Copy link
Owner

digint commented Jul 14, 2023

Thanks, merged in: 9dfee7b

Comparing the asciidoc and asciidoctor man pages, everything looks OK.

I checked as well, there is subtle whitespace changes, and email addresses are shown in brackets <>.

I'm thinking of making "asciidoc" the default again, do you have any insight about the project? Do you expect it to live on for a while?

I will need to check painfullness for adaptions to debian package, on gentoo it should only change BDEPEND="app-text/asciidoc".

@digint digint force-pushed the master branch 6 times, most recently from 594fc6d to dac6350 Compare August 5, 2023 18:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants