Too many aria roles were set to widget or otherwise were incorrect, added a comment source for where I got my information for which abstract roles were the type of which roles

Refs: #4371

Previously there was a test to confirm a table with role of application was a data table, but the spec indicates that has an anstract role of structure meaning this should be a structure table instead

This commit is just a test correction

Refs: #4421

widget not inline rule corrected isWidgetType check to consider composite widget types

- learned sometimes we intentionally spec change
- added `window` as a supported type, and `composite` which was missing from the readme
- undid my change to `isWidgetType`

Refs: #4371

test change was only for data tables, but we didn't want to keep that type change

Refs: #4371

add `window` to has-widget-role, renamed

Refs: #4371

better pass/fail english message, removed outdated translations

Refs: #4371

Addresses some feedback from Wilco in the PR that this isn't the change
we want

This reverts commit facd65f.

reflected in focus-order-semantics

…order-semantics

addressing more pr feedback

This reverts commit bfa95ae.

extends prior work by accounting for all standards aria roles changes

last feedback yay