Added NTLM option for On Premise CRM's

[d4hines]

This addresses the Node side of #33. I've added the option to use NTLM authentication against On-Premise CRM. I've done this using request-ntlm, specifically FrankyBoy's branch, as the main branch is broken. This branch is published as request-ntlm-continued on npm. Please let me know if you have any suggestions/objections to anything.

[d4hines]

Looks like there are some issues with the return data of some requests. It's breaking when I try to integrate with gulp-webresource. Let me add some better handling of the return data and try again.

[davidyack]

Thanks @d4hines for submitting this...one of the things I'm struggling with is trying to keep auth out of the = library...you probably notice we don't bake in ADAL libs, 'm not sure I really want to take a dependency on the ntlm lib. Let me take a look a bit at what you did to get it working, and see if I have any suggestions on how we could keep it more loosely coupled

[d4hines]

I understand, and that's reasonable. Look it over and decide whether it gets a pass or not. If it doesn't, let me know and we'll come up with an alternative. On Feb 12, 2018 12:09 PM, "David Yack" <notifications@github.com> wrote: Thanks @d4hines <https://github.com/d4hines> for submitting this...one of the things I'm struggling with is trying to keep auth out of the = library...you probably notice we don't bake in ADAL libs, 'm not sure I really want to take a dependency on the ntlm lib. Let me take a look a bit at what you did to get it working, and see if I have any suggestions on how we could keep it more loosely coupled — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#54 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AYEAF-0OizQYZCoTEWqGiLgQsuFxteTpks5tUHBOgaJpZM4SAmCG> .

[davidyack]

Rather than keep this hanging around closing for now