New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Improvement] add checking for table Partitioning, SortOrders, Distribution, and Indexes to the web e2e test #3210
Labels
Comments
LauraXia123
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 15, 2024
…st (#3301) ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? add checking table properties to the web e2e test <img width="647" alt="image" src="https://github.com/datastrato/gravitino/assets/17310559/012fcd91-ab31-46a0-8e87-3c5d66ffd21f"> <img width="655" alt="image" src="https://github.com/datastrato/gravitino/assets/17310559/c226551b-24e2-4c5e-88aa-24c2cfb10c2f"> ### Why are the changes needed? Fix: #3210 ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? N/A ### How was this patch tested? IT
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 15, 2024
…st (#3301) ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? add checking table properties to the web e2e test <img width="647" alt="image" src="https://github.com/datastrato/gravitino/assets/17310559/012fcd91-ab31-46a0-8e87-3c5d66ffd21f"> <img width="655" alt="image" src="https://github.com/datastrato/gravitino/assets/17310559/c226551b-24e2-4c5e-88aa-24c2cfb10c2f"> ### Why are the changes needed? Fix: #3210 ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? N/A ### How was this patch tested? IT
LauraXia123
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 17, 2024
…st (#3400) ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? add checking table properties to the web e2e test <img width="647" alt="image" src="https://github.com/datastrato/gravitino/assets/17310559/012fcd91-ab31-46a0-8e87-3c5d66ffd21f"> <img width="655" alt="image" src="https://github.com/datastrato/gravitino/assets/17310559/c226551b-24e2-4c5e-88aa-24c2cfb10c2f"> ### Why are the changes needed? Fix: #3210 ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? N/A ### How was this patch tested? IT Co-authored-by: CHEYNE <contact@ch3yne.com>
jerryshao
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 20, 2024
…b e2e te…" This reverts commit 2944fa4.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
What would you like to be improved?
When creating a table, the columns may have specific partitioning, sort orders, distribution, indexes, and other fields that need to be validated in web e2e tests.
How should we improve?
Add checking for table Partitioning, SortOrders, Distribution, and Indexes to the web e2e test
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: