Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

backport: Merge bitcoin#22359 #6025

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 24, 2024
Merged

Conversation

vijaydasmp
Copy link

bitcoin backports

@vijaydasmp vijaydasmp changed the title backport: backport: Merge bitcoin#22630, 21500, 22359, 21800, 20233 May 16, 2024
@vijaydasmp vijaydasmp force-pushed the bp23_5 branch 4 times, most recently from 0cdeeef to 4834ec2 Compare May 18, 2024 04:29
@vijaydasmp vijaydasmp changed the title backport: Merge bitcoin#22630, 21500, 22359, 21800, 20233 backport: Merge bitcoin#22630, 21500, 22359, 21800 May 18, 2024
@vijaydasmp vijaydasmp changed the title backport: Merge bitcoin#22630, 21500, 22359, 21800 backport: Merge bitcoin#22630, 22359, 21800 May 18, 2024
@vijaydasmp vijaydasmp force-pushed the bp23_5 branch 2 times, most recently from 0759871 to 41a9cd3 Compare May 18, 2024 11:54
@vijaydasmp vijaydasmp changed the title backport: Merge bitcoin#22630, 22359, 21800 backport: Merge bitcoin#22630, 22359 May 18, 2024
@vijaydasmp vijaydasmp marked this pull request as ready for review May 18, 2024 17:25
src/test/miner_tests.cpp Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@vijaydasmp vijaydasmp changed the title backport: Merge bitcoin#22630, 22359 backport: Merge bitcoin#22359 May 20, 2024
@vijaydasmp vijaydasmp requested a review from UdjinM6 May 21, 2024 05:42
Copy link

@UdjinM6 UdjinM6 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK

@vijaydasmp
Copy link
Author

Hello @knst @PastaPastaPasta requesting review

Copy link
Member

@PastaPastaPasta PastaPastaPasta left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK e326bdb

…dToMempool when tx is not in the mempool

fa6fd3d wallet: Properly set fInMempool in mempool notifications (MarcoFalke)

Pull request description:

  A wallet method (like bumping the fee) might have set `fInMempool` to false because the transaction was removed from the mempool (See commit fa4e088).

  Avoid setting it back to true (incorrectly) in the validation interface background thread.

  Fixes bitcoin#22357

ACKs for top commit:
  ryanofsky:
    Code review ACK fa6fd3d. Only change since last review is extending workaround to `transactionRemovedFromMempool`. Since we know this workaround is imperfect and the goal of this PR is mainly to fix CI errors, I would probably be inclined to limit the workaround to as few places as possible where we have seen actual failures, instead of adding the workaround to as many places as possible, where there is some chance it might trigger new failures. But since this workaround is so straightforward and almost looks like a real fix, probably it doesn't matter.
  meshcollider:
    utACK fa6fd3d

Tree-SHA512: d690136a577f1f532aa1fee80d3f6600ff7fc61286fbf564a53d7938d5ae52d33f0dbb0fef8b8c041a4970fb424f0b9f1ee7ce791e0ff8354e0000ecc9e22b84
@PastaPastaPasta PastaPastaPasta merged commit f6855c0 into dashpay:develop May 24, 2024
4 of 5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants