forked from bitcoin/bitcoin
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
backport: Merge bitcoin#21848,22003 #6010
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
vijaydasmp
force-pushed
the
bp23_11
branch
2 times, most recently
from
May 6, 2024 11:30
b59dc8d
to
e501043
Compare
vijaydasmp
changed the title
backport: Merge bitcoin#20773
backport: Merge bitcoin#21848,21913,2203,22403,22135,22169
May 6, 2024
vijaydasmp
force-pushed
the
bp23_11
branch
3 times, most recently
from
May 7, 2024 10:56
98df67d
to
f41a8ee
Compare
This pull request has conflicts, please rebase. |
vijaydasmp
changed the title
backport: Merge bitcoin#21848,21913,2203,22403,22135,22169
backport: Merge bitcoin#21848,21913,2203, [22403,22135,22169]
May 15, 2024
vijaydasmp
changed the title
backport: Merge bitcoin#21848,21913,2203, [22403,22135,22169]
backport: Merge bitcoin#21848,21913,2203
May 18, 2024
vijaydasmp
force-pushed
the
bp23_11
branch
3 times, most recently
from
May 21, 2024 06:40
56b09ad
to
aebf5d5
Compare
vijaydasmp
changed the title
backport: Merge bitcoin#21848,21913,2203
backport: Merge bitcoin#21848,22003
May 21, 2024
Hello @UdjinM6 , requesting review |
UdjinM6
approved these changes
May 21, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
utACK
Hello @knst @PastaPastaPasta requesting review |
PastaPastaPasta
approved these changes
May 24, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
utACK aebf5d5
…-independent fafd121 refactor: Make CFeeRate constructor architecture-independent (MarcoFalke) Pull request description: Currently the constructor is architecture dependent. This is confusing for several reasons: * It is impossible to create a transaction larger than the max value of `uint32_t`, so a 64-bit `size_t` is not needed * Policy (and consensus) code should be arch-independent * The current code will print spurious compile errors when compiled on 32-bit systems: ``` policy/feerate.cpp:23:22: warning: result of comparison of constant 9223372036854775807 with expression of type 'size_t' (aka 'unsigned int') is always true [-Wtautological-constant-out-of-range-compare] assert(nBytes_ <= uint64_t(std::numeric_limits<int64_t>::max())); ``` Fix all issues by making it arch-independent. Also, fix `{}` style according to dev notes. ACKs for top commit: theStack: re-ACK fafd121 promag: Code review ACK fafd121. Tree-SHA512: e16f75bad9ee8088b87e873906d9b5633449417a6996a226a2f37d33a2b7d4f2fd91df68998a77e52163de20b40c57fadabe7fe3502e599cbb98494178591833
793b268 txmempool: add thread safety annotations (Anthony Towns) Pull request description: Add missing thread safety guards to CTxMempool members. ACKs for top commit: MarcoFalke: cr ACK 793b268 hebasto: re-ACK 793b268, only suggested changes since my [previous](bitcoin#22003 (review)) review. Tree-SHA512: c5eb197c63375c80c325a276f322177e84e0181c94a124720b1a364e964ac223fc6fdfd89bd0e152b76959fb6b97bfbf82dd36ec105ed6e2dc045ede717df4ae
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
backport