Gossip powered group cache library

Why not plain groupcache?

Manually managing the list of peers sucks

Why mailgun's groupcache?

We using mailgun's groupcache fork instead of Google's because they've added support for context.Context, go.mod, and explicit key removal and expiration.

Name		Name	Last commit message	Last commit date
Latest commit History 62 Commits
.github/workflows		.github/workflows
tools		tools
transport		transport
.gitattributes		.gitattributes
COPYING		COPYING
Makefile		Makefile
README.md		README.md
cluster.go		cluster.go
config.go		config.go
go.mod		go.mod
go.sum		go.sum
gossipcache.go		gossipcache.go
gossipcache_test.go		gossipcache_test.go
log_ml.go		log_ml.go
transport.go		transport.go

License

darvaza-proxy/gossipcache

Folders and files

Latest commit

History

Repository files navigation

Gossip powered group cache library

Why not plain groupcache?

Why mailgun's groupcache?

See also

About

Topics

Resources

License

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Languages