Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DAOS-15384 pool: Checkpoint properties not set #14380

Merged
merged 15 commits into from
May 20, 2024
Merged

Conversation

jolivier23
Copy link
Contributor

Setting checkpoint properties on pool create was
not actually setting the properties.

Test-tag: test_wal_checkpoint_metrics

Required-githooks: true

Before requesting gatekeeper:

  • Two review approvals and any prior change requests have been resolved.
  • Testing is complete and all tests passed or there is a reason documented in the PR why it should be force landed and forced-landing tag is set.
  • Features: (or Test-tag*) commit pragma was used or there is a reason documented that there are no appropriate tags for this PR.
  • Commit messages follows the guidelines outlined here.
  • Any tests skipped by the ticket being addressed have been run and passed in the PR.

Gatekeeper:

  • You are the appropriate gatekeeper to be landing the patch.
  • The PR has 2 reviews by people familiar with the code, including appropriate owners.
  • Githooks were used. If not, request that user install them and check copyright dates.
  • Checkpatch issues are resolved. Pay particular attention to ones that will show up on future PRs.
  • All builds have passed. Check non-required builds for any new compiler warnings.
  • Sufficient testing is done. Check feature pragmas and test tags and that tests skipped for the ticket are run and now pass with the changes.
  • If applicable, the PR has addressed any potential version compatibility issues.
  • Check the target branch. If it is master branch, should the PR go to a feature branch? If it is a release branch, does it have merge approval in the JIRA ticket.
  • Extra checks if forced landing is requested
    • Review comments are sufficiently resolved, particularly by prior reviewers that requested changes.
    • No new NLT or valgrind warnings. Check the classic view.
    • Quick-build or Quick-functional is not used.
  • Fix the commit message upon landing. Check the standard here. Edit it to create a single commit. If necessary, ask submitter for a new summary.

Setting checkpoint properties on pool create was
not actually setting the properties.

Test-tag: test_wal_checkpoint_metrics

Required-githooks: true

Signed-off-by: Jeff Olivier <jeffolivier@google.com>
@jolivier23 jolivier23 requested review from a team as code owners May 15, 2024 16:23
Copy link

github-actions bot commented May 15, 2024

Ticket title is 'engine_pool_checkpoint_* metrics non-zero for pool with check pointing disabled'
Status is 'In Review'
Labels: 'md_on_ssd,scrubbed'
https://daosio.atlassian.net/browse/DAOS-15384

@daosbuild1
Copy link
Collaborator

Test stage Unit Test bdev with memcheck on EL 8.8 completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com/job/daos-stack/job/daos/job/PR-14380/1/display/redirect

@daosbuild1
Copy link
Collaborator

Test stage Unit Test with memcheck on EL 8.8 completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com/job/daos-stack/job/daos/job/PR-14380/1/display/redirect

Required-githooks: true

Signed-off-by: Jeff Olivier <jeffolivier@google.com>
Set it to 5 seconds so we can try a different target
more quickly if a rank is down.

Features: rebuild

Required-githooks: true

Signed-off-by: Jeff Olivier <jeffolivier@google.com>
Required-githooks: true

Signed-off-by: Jeff Olivier <jeffolivier@google.com>
Required-githooks: true

Signed-off-by: Jeff Olivier <jeffolivier@google.com>
@jolivier23 jolivier23 requested review from a team as code owners May 15, 2024 22:03
Required-githooks: true

Signed-off-by: Jeff Olivier <jeffolivier@google.com>
Required-githooks: true

Signed-off-by: Jeff Olivier <jeffolivier@google.com>
@daosbuild1
Copy link
Collaborator

Test stage Functional on EL 8.8 completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com/job/daos-stack/job/daos/job/PR-14380/4/display/redirect

wangshilong
wangshilong previously approved these changes May 16, 2024
@phender
Copy link
Contributor

phender commented May 16, 2024

We'll want to use a commit message that has:

Fixes: DAOS-15384
Skip-func-hw-test-medium-md-on-ssd: false
Test-tag: WalMetrics
Features: pool

where Features: pool is my best guess as what additional functional testing is needed for the files changes.

Fixes: DAOS-15384
Skip-func-hw-test-medium-md-on-ssd: false
Test-tag: WalMetrics

Required-githooks: true

Signed-off-by: Jeff Olivier <jeffolivier@google.com>
@daosbuild1
Copy link
Collaborator

Test stage Functional Hardware Medium MD on SSD completed with status UNSTABLE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com/job/daos-stack/job/daos//view/change-requests/job/PR-14380/6/testReport/

Fixes: DAOS-15384
Skip-func-hw-test-medium-md-on-ssd: false
Test-tag: WalMetrics

Required-githooks: true

Signed-off-by: Phil Henderson <phillip.henderson@intel.com>
@daosbuild1
Copy link
Collaborator

Test stage Functional Hardware Medium MD on SSD completed with status UNSTABLE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com/job/daos-stack/job/daos//view/change-requests/job/PR-14380/8/testReport/

phender and others added 3 commits May 17, 2024 13:49
Fixes: DAOS-15384
Skip-func-hw-test-medium-md-on-ssd: false
Test-tag: WalMetrics

Required-githooks: true

Signed-off-by: Phil Henderson <phillip.henderson@intel.com>
Required-githooks: true

Signed-off-by: Jeff Olivier <jeffolivier@google.com>
    Fixes: DAOS-15384
    Skip-func-hw-test-medium-md-on-ssd: false
    Test-tag: WalMetrics

Required-githooks: true

Signed-off-by: Jeff Olivier <jeffolivier@google.com>
@jolivier23 jolivier23 requested a review from NiuYawei May 20, 2024 05:21
@jolivier23 jolivier23 merged commit 39a2930 into master May 20, 2024
52 checks passed
@jolivier23 jolivier23 deleted the jvolivie/checkpt branch May 20, 2024 06:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
5 participants