Overhaul endian handling in ByteBuffer and FastNBT #5543
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Rather than juggling "swapped" and "unswapped" versions of integers, different library functions, #defines, etc., simply always read everything byte-by-byte.
This works regardless of host CPU endian, got optimised down to either a normal load or a byteswap on every compiler I tested - only 1 instruction on most CPU architectures. See https://godbolt.org/z/EYzPod7bh
This commit introduces a "Bytes" array type to keep endian-sensitive data seperate from host data, alongside the needed C++ template machinery for it to work seamlessly. This approach is a little bit safer as well since you get length- and type-checking for most callsites.
Fixes #5538