New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore(deps): update all non-major npm dependencies #188
Conversation
⚠ Artifact update problemRenovate failed to update an artifact related to this branch. You probably do not want to merge this PR as-is. ♻ Renovate will retry this branch, including artifacts, only when one of the following happens:
The artifact failure details are included below: File name: pnpm-lock.yaml
|
857dfcb
to
69a0b31
Compare
|
cdf70dd
to
cba306f
Compare
cba306f
to
5705081
Compare
Edited/Blocked NotificationRenovate will not automatically rebase this PR, because it does not recognize the last commit author and assumes somebody else may have edited the PR. You can manually request rebase by checking the rebase/retry box above. |
This PR contains the following updates:
^17.3.6
->^17.3.7
~17.3.7
->~17.3.8
~17.3.6
->~17.3.7
~17.3.7
->~17.3.8
~17.3.7
->~17.3.8
~17.3.7
->~17.3.8
~17.3.7
->~17.3.8
~17.3.7
->~17.3.8
~17.3.7
->~17.3.8
~17.3.7
->~17.3.8
~17.3.7
->~17.3.8
^20.12.10
->^20.12.12
^20.12.10
->^20.12.12
^18.3.1
->^18.3.2
^7.8.0
->^7.9.0
^7.8.0
->^7.9.0
^13.8.1
->^13.9.0
^0.21.0
->^0.21.2
^0.10.0
->^0.10.1
^10.3.12
->^10.3.15
^5.0.5
->^5.0.7
^2.0.16
->^2.0.17
Release Notes
angular/angular-cli (@angular-devkit/build-angular)
v17.3.7
Compare Source
angular/angular (@angular/animations)
v17.3.8
Compare Source
compiler
core
typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin)
v7.9.0
Compare Source
🩹 Fixes
❤️ Thank You
You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.
typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (@typescript-eslint/parser)
v7.9.0
Compare Source
This was a version bump only for parser to align it with other projects, there were no code changes.
You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.
cypress-io/cypress (cypress)
v13.9.0
Compare Source
Changelog: https://docs.cypress.io/guides/references/changelog#13-9-0
evanw/esbuild (esbuild)
v0.21.2
Compare Source
Correct
this
in field and accessor decorators (#3761)This release changes the value of
this
in initializers for class field and accessor decorators from the module-levelthis
value to the appropriatethis
value for the decorated element (either the class or the instance). It was previously incorrect due to lack of test coverage. Here's an example of a decorator that doesn't work without this change:Allow
es2023
as a target environment (#3762)TypeScript recently added
es2023
as a compilation target, so esbuild now supports this too. There is no difference between a target ofes2022
andes2023
as far as esbuild is concerned since the 2023 edition of JavaScript doesn't introduce any new syntax features.v0.21.1
Compare Source
Fix a regression with
--keep-names
(#3756)The previous release introduced a regression with the
--keep-names
setting and object literals withget
/set
accessor methods, in which case the generated code contained syntax errors. This release fixes the regression:v0.21.0
Compare Source
This release doesn't contain any deliberately-breaking changes. However, it contains a very complex new feature and while all of esbuild's tests pass, I would not be surprised if an important edge case turns out to be broken. So I'm releasing this as a breaking change release to avoid causing any trouble. As usual, make sure to test your code when you upgrade.
Implement the JavaScript decorators proposal (#104)
With this release, esbuild now contains an implementation of the upcoming JavaScript decorators proposal. This is the same feature that shipped in TypeScript 5.0 and has been highly-requested on esbuild's issue tracker. You can read more about them in that blog post and in this other (now slightly outdated) extensive blog post here: https://2ality.com/2022/10/javascript-decorators.html. Here's a quick example:
Note that this feature is different than the existing "TypeScript experimental decorators" feature that esbuild already implements. It uses similar syntax but behaves very differently, and the two are not compatible (although it's sometimes possible to write decorators that work with both). TypeScript experimental decorators will still be supported by esbuild going forward as they have been around for a long time, are very widely used, and let you do certain things that are not possible with JavaScript decorators (such as decorating function parameters). By default esbuild will parse and transform JavaScript decorators, but you can tell esbuild to parse and transform TypeScript experimental decorators instead by setting
"experimentalDecorators": true
in yourtsconfig.json
file.Probably at least half of the work for this feature went into creating a test suite that exercises many of the proposal's edge cases: https://github.com/evanw/decorator-tests. It has given me a reasonable level of confidence that esbuild's initial implementation is acceptable. However, I don't have access to a significant sample of real code that uses JavaScript decorators. If you're currently using JavaScript decorators in a real code base, please try out esbuild's implementation and let me know if anything seems off.
This proposal has been in the works for a very long time (work began around 10 years ago in 2014) and it is finally getting close to becoming part of the JavaScript language. However, it's still a work in progress and isn't a part of JavaScript yet, so keep in mind that any code that uses JavaScript decorators may need to be updated as the feature continues to evolve. The decorators proposal is pretty close to its final form but it can and likely will undergo some small behavioral adjustments before it ends up becoming a part of the standard. If/when that happens, I will update esbuild's implementation to match the specification. I will not be supporting old versions of the specification.
Optimize the generated code for private methods
Previously when lowering private methods for old browsers, esbuild would generate one
WeakSet
for each private method. This mirrors similar logic for generating oneWeakSet
for each private field. Using a separateWeakMap
for private fields is necessary as their assignment can be observable:This prints
true false
because this partially-initialized instance has#x
but not#y
. In other words, it's not true that all class instances will always have all of their private fields. However, the assignment of private methods to a class instance is not observable. In other words, it's true that all class instances will always have all of their private methods. This means esbuild can lower private methods into code where all methods share a singleWeakSet
, which is smaller, faster, and uses less memory. Other JavaScript processing tools such as the TypeScript compiler already make this optimization. Here's what this change looks like:Fix an obscure bug with lowering class members with computed property keys
When class members that use newer syntax features are transformed for older target environments, they sometimes need to be relocated. However, care must be taken to not reorder any side effects caused by computed property keys. For example, the following code must evaluate
a()
thenb()
thenc()
:Previously esbuild did this by shifting the computed property key forward to the next spot in the evaluation order. Classes evaluate all computed keys first and then all static class elements, so if the last computed key needs to be shifted, esbuild previously inserted a static block at start of the class body, ensuring it came before all other static class elements:
However, this could cause esbuild to accidentally generate a syntax error if the computed property key contains code that isn't allowed in a static block, such as an
await
expression. With this release, esbuild fixes this problem by shifting the computed property key backward to the previous spot in the evaluation order instead, which may push it into theextends
clause or even before the class itself:Fix some
--keep-names
edge casesThe
NamedEvaluation
syntax-directed operation in the JavaScript specification gives certain anonymous expressions aname
property depending on where they are in the syntax tree. For example, the following initializers convey aname
value:When you enable esbuild's
--keep-names
setting, esbuild generates additional code to represent thisNamedEvaluation
operation so that the value of thename
property persists even when the identifiers are renamed (e.g. due to minification).However, I recently learned that esbuild's implementation of
NamedEvaluation
is missing a few cases. Specifically esbuild was missing property definitions, class initializers, logical-assignment operators. These cases should now all be handled:joshuajaco/eslint-plugin-workspaces (eslint-plugin-workspaces)
v0.10.1
Compare Source
isaacs/node-glob (glob)
v10.3.15
Compare Source
v10.3.14
Compare Source
v10.3.13
Compare Source
isaacs/rimraf (rimraf)
v5.0.7
Compare Source
v5.0.6
Compare Source
vuejs/language-tools (vue-tsc)
v2.0.17
Compare Source
Features
Bug Fixes
v-on="{}"
(#4333)<script setup>
should not be used as a variable in template (#4353)scoped
not working (#4355)<style>
completions and html custom data completions not provided in some cases (#4092)forceUseTs
options not workingOther Changes
v2.2.0
tov2.2.2
.v0.0.42
tov0.0.44
.allowTextChangesInNewFiles
never true for embedded documentscommand
resolve capability only for specific refactors (https://github.com/volarjs/services/issues/94)mxsdev.typescript-explorer
vueCompilerOptions.experimentalUseElementAccessInTemplate
packageManager
(#4358) - Thanks @so1veConfiguration
📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).
🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.
♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.
👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.
This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.