Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feedback neede: potentially wrong test -- 4 events found instead of expected 2 #601

Open
maxaalexeeva opened this issue Nov 5, 2018 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@maxaalexeeva
Copy link
Contributor

There should be two events based on the test, but there are four in the output. Please, verify that the test asks for the right number of events. If there should indeed be 2 and not 4, please indicate which of the events in the output are correct and which need to be discarded.

The test:

val sent5b = "Figure 3. Raf and PI3K bind more to ubiquitinated Ras than to non-ubiquitinated Ras."

The error message:

- should extract correct bindings with theme and theme2 *** FAILED *** (406 milliseconds)
[info]   List(org.clulab.reach.mentions.CorefEventMention@7a9947c0, org.clulab.reach.mentions.CorefEventMention@38b449b8, org.clulab.reach.mentions.CorefEventMention@61f51d14, org.clulab.reach.mentions.CorefEventMention@c2c3aeba) had size 4 instead of expected size 2 (TestBindingEvents.scala:90)

The (most relevant) webapp output:
image

EVENTS:   4

MENTION TEXT:  Raf and PI3K bind more to ubiquitinated Ras than to non-ubiquitinated Ras
LABELS:        List(Binding, SimpleEvent, Event, PossibleController)
DISPLAY LABEL: Binding
	------------------------------
	RULE => binding1b
	TYPE => BioEventMention
	------------------------------

	------------------------------
	TRIGGER => bind
	theme (List(Family, Equivalable, BioChemicalEntity, BioEntity, Entity, PossibleController)) => Raf
	theme (List(Family, Equivalable, BioChemicalEntity, BioEntity, Entity, PossibleController)) => Ras
	with 1 modification =>
		PTM (negated=false) = "Ubiquitination" based on "ubiquitinated"
CONTEXT: NONE
	------------------------------



MENTION TEXT:  Raf and PI3K bind more to ubiquitinated Ras
LABELS:        List(Binding, SimpleEvent, Event, PossibleController)
DISPLAY LABEL: Binding
	------------------------------
	RULE => binding1b
	TYPE => BioEventMention
	------------------------------

	------------------------------
	TRIGGER => bind
	theme (List(Family, Equivalable, BioChemicalEntity, BioEntity, Entity, PossibleController)) => Raf
	theme (List(Family, Equivalable, BioChemicalEntity, BioEntity, Entity, PossibleController)) => Ras
	with 1 modification =>
		PTM (negated=false) = "Ubiquitination" based on "ubiquitinated"
CONTEXT: NONE
	------------------------------



MENTION TEXT:  PI3K bind more to ubiquitinated Ras than to non-ubiquitinated Ras
LABELS:        List(Binding, SimpleEvent, Event, PossibleController)
DISPLAY LABEL: Binding
	------------------------------
	RULE => binding1b
	TYPE => BioEventMention
	------------------------------

	------------------------------
	TRIGGER => bind
	theme (List(Gene_or_gene_product, MacroMolecule, Equivalable, BioChemicalEntity, BioEntity, Entity, PossibleController)) => PI3K
	theme (List(Family, Equivalable, BioChemicalEntity, BioEntity, Entity, PossibleController)) => Ras
	with 1 modification =>
		PTM (negated=false) = "Ubiquitination" based on "ubiquitinated"
CONTEXT: NONE
	------------------------------



MENTION TEXT:  PI3K bind more to ubiquitinated Ras
LABELS:        List(Binding, SimpleEvent, Event, PossibleController)
DISPLAY LABEL: Binding
	------------------------------
	RULE => binding1b
	TYPE => BioEventMention
	------------------------------

	------------------------------
	TRIGGER => bind
	theme (List(Gene_or_gene_product, MacroMolecule, Equivalable, BioChemicalEntity, BioEntity, Entity, PossibleController)) => PI3K
	theme (List(Family, Equivalable, BioChemicalEntity, BioEntity, Entity, PossibleController)) => Ras
	with 1 modification =>
		PTM (negated=false) = "Ubiquitination" based on "ubiquitinated"
CONTEXT: NONE
	------------------------------
@maxaalexeeva
Copy link
Contributor Author

@MihaiSurdeanu might be something for you to have a look at. One of the two curretnly ignored event tests.

@MihaiSurdeanu
Copy link
Contributor

Actually, I think the correct number if 4!

@johnbachman: what do you think?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants