Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add test test_multi_column_two_ranges, which should fail but doesn't #1240

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

Centril
Copy link
Contributor

@Centril Centril commented May 15, 2024

Description of Changes

Please describe your change, mention any related tickets, and so on here.

API and ABI breaking changes

If this is an API or ABI breaking change, please apply the
corresponding GitHub label.

Expected complexity level and risk

How complicated do you think these changes are? Grade on a scale from 1 to 5,
where 1 is a trivial change, and 5 is a deep-reaching and complex change.

This complexity rating applies not only to the complexity apparent in the diff,
but also to its interactions with existing and future code.

If you answered more than a 2, explain what is complex about the PR,
and what other components it interacts with in potentially concerning ways.

Testing

Describe any testing you've done, and any testing you'd like your reviewers to do,
so that you're confident that all the changes work as expected!

  • Write a test you've completed here.
  • Write a test you want a reviewer to do here, so they can check it off when they're satisfied.

@@ -722,4 +722,22 @@ SELECT * FROM inventory",
assert!(result[0].data.is_empty());
Ok(())
}

#[test]
fn test_multi_column_two_ranges() -> ResultTest<()> {
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You_Shall_Not_Pass!_0-1_screenshot

...but it does

@gefjon
Copy link
Contributor

gefjon commented May 15, 2024

  1. Test doesn't demonstrate that the query actually uses the index.
  2. Test doesn't demonstrate that query correctly selects only rows within both ranges, not e.g. { a: 4, b: 7 }.

@Centril
Copy link
Contributor Author

Centril commented May 16, 2024

@gefjon the point of the test is to show that the current implementation is wrong. This PR will be morphed into a fix and the test will of course be adjusted to show that an index is not used.

@Centril Centril force-pushed the centril/fix-select_best_index branch from 06b4cfe to 5c561b3 Compare May 22, 2024 15:33
@Centril
Copy link
Contributor Author

Centril commented May 30, 2024

Closing this as it is being fixed in #1316 instead.

DO NOT DELETE THE BRANCH

@Centril Centril closed this May 30, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants