New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add support to test update library with local kernel #1306
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Makes sense, thanks for the PR. Can you also document this in https://github.com/cilium/ebpf/blob/main/docs/ebpf/contributing/index.md#updating-kernel-dependencies ?
curl -fL "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/plain/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c?h=v$KERNEL_VERSION" -o "$tmp/libbpf.c" | ||
if [ -d $KERNEL_VERSION ]; then | ||
# Copy libbpf/vmlinux/bpf_testmod from local directory | ||
cp $KERNEL_VERSION/libbpf.c $tmp |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would it make sense to assume that KERNEL_VERSION is a checkout of the linux source? Then you can just run make KERNEL_VERSION=/path/to/linux
. Right now you need to copy things around.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I guess it's possible, but at the moment I have the kernel build on another server, so current change fits me better.. maybe we could introduce more variables to allow that? I felt like the current change is abusing bit the KERNEL_VERSION variable, but it's simple ;-)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hm, maybe you can abuse rsync
to get transparent copy from your build server? Basically, the usual thing would be to rsync from a local directory, but if you set your variable to user@host:/path/to/linux
it'd slurp that over.
I don't much see the point of adding the option in a way that means extra work for the common case to be honest.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
hum, not sure I see enough benefit in doing the rsync.. I don't think the local kernel update will happen that often.. but I'm ok to keep that change around just for my purposes, there's no need for that to be merged if it's a problem
Adding support to update update library with local kernel by passing local directory through KERNEL_VERSION, like: $ ls ../data/ bpf_testmod.ko libbpf.c vmlinux $ make update-kernel-deps KERNEL_VERSION=../data This allows to test latest kernel uapi changes with ebpf/cilium library and tetragon. Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
945cfba
to
804a455
Compare
Adding support to update update library with local kernel by passing local directory through KERNEL_VERSION, like:
This allows to test latest kernel uapi changes with ebpf/cilium library and tetragon.