Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(plugins-doc) update documentation for centreon-plugin-applications-protocol-[cifs,ftp,sftp] plugins #3269

Conversation

Evan-Adam
Copy link
Contributor

CTOR:258

Description

Please include a short summary of the changes and what is the purpose of the PR. Any relevant information should be added to help reviewers.

Target version (i.e. version that this PR changes)

  • 22.04.x
  • 22.10.x
  • 23.04.x
  • 23.10.x
  • 24.04.x
  • Cloud
  • Monitoring Connectors

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented May 3, 2024

PR Previews
🚀 Deployed preview to https://docs-preview-int.centreon.com/previews/pr-3269/staging/
at Wed, 15 May 2024 12:09:37 GMT

NOTE: Previews are deleted after 30 days of inactivity

@cg-tw
Copy link
Collaborator

cg-tw commented May 3, 2024

@Evan-Adam lots of problems here. I only reviewed the FR version, but all comments apply to the EN version too.

@Evan-Adam Evan-Adam force-pushed the CTOR-258-escalation-centreon-plugin-applications-protocol-cifs-mode-files-count-filter-file-not-working-with-max-depth branch from d0cf713 to adbb78e Compare May 15, 2024 09:55
@Evan-Adam Evan-Adam changed the title CTOR-258-escalation-centreon-plugin-applications-protocol-cifs-mode-files-count-filter-file-not-working-with-max-depth feat(plugins-doc) update documentation for centreon-plugin-applications-protocol-[cifs,ftp,sftp] plugins May 15, 2024
Co-authored-by: cg-tw <83637804+cg-tw@users.noreply.github.com>
@cg-tw cg-tw merged commit 0a43864 into staging May 16, 2024
6 checks passed
@cg-tw cg-tw deleted the CTOR-258-escalation-centreon-plugin-applications-protocol-cifs-mode-files-count-filter-file-not-working-with-max-depth branch May 16, 2024 08:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants