Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

migrate to extjs 5: CRUD #81

Closed
wants to merge 37 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

cristianbuj
Copy link

No description provided.

@cristianbuj cristianbuj force-pushed the extjs-5-v2 branch 3 times, most recently from bc70888 to 4bec556 Compare March 9, 2015 08:50
@cristianbuj cristianbuj force-pushed the extjs-5-v2 branch 8 times, most recently from ded66ae to 0126646 Compare April 14, 2015 14:22
gsidler and others added 19 commits April 17, 2015 17:58
…ent, the event needs to be removed from the store.
…ia: Start time, end time and calendar id. This garantees deterministic ordering of events and is a precondition for an improved event layout algorithm.
…tensible framework is loaded dynamically (class by class) while the ext/js is loaded from the archive file. Compared to the fully dynamic mode is is *much* faster. Furthermore, fixed loading of CSS files in debug and dynamic modes. In these modes, CSS files are now loaded individually, not the concatenated file.
… For most examples it was false already, for a few not. It is confusing if caching is disabled for some examples and for some not. Furthermore, if caching is disabled, debugging with Firebug becomes really painful.
…recurrence-widget-dont-load-in-dynamic-model' into extjs-5-v2
@wemersonjanuario
Copy link

please merge.

@bmoeskau
Copy link
Owner

Very belated, but thanks a LOT for your effort on this. Unfortunately it's not mergeable not only because of conflicts, but also because it includes all of the agenda/list and other stuff in addition to straight Ext 5 fixes. The good news is that I did go through this PR in detail and pulled as much as I could into #90 which is currently in progress. Even though I'm closing it, this PR really did save me a lot of time -- thanks!

@bmoeskau bmoeskau closed this Apr 18, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants