Add missing AppFeature records

[jrmccannon]

Ticket

No ticket.

Description

With the replacement of magic links in Admin Console with the API, it is relying on the AppFeature record to exist and for the monthly quota to be set. With it not set, AdminConsole can't send magic links.

Shape

• Added the max quota to the intiialize steps for AdminConsole.
• Also added a migration that will add an AppFeature record with some default values to every app that currently doesn't have an AppFeature record. This would be every application created before AppFeatures went live (June-August time frame).

Screenshots

N/A

Checklist

I did the following to ensure that my changes were tested thoroughly:

• Ran the script against my local database to make sure it executed and only updated the records it should have

I did the following to ensure that my changes do not introduce security vulnerabilities:

• N/A

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 50.05834% with 428 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 32.94%. Comparing base (83019a2) to head (2404ea5).

Files	Patch %	Lines
...te/20240315164249_AddMissingAppFeature.Designer.cs	0.00%	410 Missing ⚠️
...ions/Sqlite/20240315164249_AddMissingAppFeature.cs	0.00%	17 Missing ⚠️
...tions/Mssql/20240315164343_AddMissingAppFeature.cs	94.11%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #489      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   32.38%   32.94%   +0.55%     
==========================================
  Files         518      522       +4     
  Lines       26533    27390     +857     
  Branches      845      845              
==========================================
+ Hits         8594     9023     +429     
- Misses      17821    18249     +428     
  Partials      118      118              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[abergs]

I think 1000 sounds more resonable since that is what we use for external apps today.
I notice you set NULL on MaxUsers - what is the result of that?

[jrmccannon]

Good catch. When MaxUsers is NULL, there is no max.

All apps that I've seen that don't have this record are test applications. We can easily set this to something however.

[abergs]

Looks mostly good, see comment