[trivial]: Correct spellings across bips

[Varunram]

No description provided.

[practicalswift]

ACK 333a605

[luke-jr]

BIP 35: @jgarzik
BIP 60: @genjix
BIPs 11, 16, 61: @gavinandresen
BIPs 80 & 81: @justusranvier @jimmysong
BIPs 98, 116, 117: @maaku @kallewoof @btcdrak
BIP 143: @jl2012 @sipa
BIP 152: @TheBlueMatt
BIP 157: @Roasbeef @aakselrod @jimpo
BIP 158: @Roasbeef @aakselrod
BIP 174: @achow101
BIP 176: @jimmysong

@practicalswift Why did you ACK this? You don't seem to be an author for any of the BIPs? O.o

[practicalswift]

@luke-jr I wasn't aware that only BIP authors were supposed to review typo fixes. Sorry about that! :-)

[luke-jr]

Yes, it's kind of a nuisance. I opened #596 a while back, but got push-back on the mailing list. :(

[jimpo]

ACK BIP 157

[sipa]

ACK BIP 143

[kallewoof]

ACK BIP 98, 116, 117.

[gavinandresen]

Perpetual ACK for all trivial changes that do not change the meaning of BIPs I wrote.

[Varunram]

ping @luke-jr, can I edit the PR just to include the BIPs which have been ACKed?

[luke-jr]

Please don't. That would reset the ACKs. I'll manually merge the applicable ones when I get a chance.

[luke-jr]

Merged BIPs 11, 16, 61, 98, 116, 117, 143, 157 in c3e8379

Leaving open for the remaining BIPs (please don't rebase)

[jgarzik]

ACK, for my small part

[murchandamus]

Comparing against master, it appears that only four typos remain unfixed:

BIP 35: desireable ↦ desirable
BIP 80: signfigant ↦ significant
BIP 81: signfigant ↦ significant
BIP 174: compatibilty ↦ compatibility

The merge-conflict appears to be due to another typo fix that got merged since this PR got opened. Given typos may be fixed now, I’m gonna merge this.

[murchandamus]

I made a mistake in resolving the merge conflict with BIP-0176 and had to revert the change in another commit to avoid force pushing. I squashed the remaining for typos into master.