Implement a tag field for BaseSolver

[svaiter]

• Implement a tag field for BaseSolver (e.g. tags = ['proximal_coordinate_descent', 'python'])
• Serialize it in the html output
• Write the necessary JS logic to filter according to this list of tag
• Allow a CLI argument to only run solvers satisfying a given tag

(issue #571)

[Badr-MOUFAD]

Here is the preview of the visualization feature, and the benchmark repository to reproduce it.
Feedback is very welcome, @svaiter.

Also, how should we handle visualization conflicts between tags and solvers?
In fact, tags are ineffective for solvers hidden by clicking on the legend. I'm thinking about re-initializing the filtering whenever the tags are used. any thoughts?

[svaiter]

Excellent ! Thank you.

In my opinion,

• Clicking a dedicated solver should deactivate the tags.
• Reciprocally, clicking a tag should reinitialise the state of the hidden solvers.
• I would prefer I think if the tag cloud is either at the end of the column, or below the solver list.
• I don't know how we should handle if there is a lot of different tag. Maybe a search area allowing to select the tag ? (maybe this is premature optimization...)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 5.55556% with 17 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 54.60%. Comparing base (18fa53d) to head (2f38264).

❗ Current head 2f38264 differs from pull request most recent head 62726cf

Please upload reports for the commit 62726cf to get more accurate results.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #586       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   80.80%   54.60%   -26.20%     
===========================================
  Files          45       44        -1     
  Lines        3027     2864      -163     
  Branches        0      529      +529     
===========================================
- Hits         2446     1564      -882     
- Misses        581     1181      +600     
- Partials        0      119      +119     

[tomMoral]

This is a nice start, would be interesting to finish this one during the sprint?