QA-536: move san file handling in its own class #20898
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
mpoeter
reviewed
May 6, 2024
Co-authored-by: Manuel Pöter <manuel@arangodb.com>
Co-authored-by: Manuel Pöter <manuel@arangodb.com>
naushniki
approved these changes
May 7, 2024
mpoeter
approved these changes
May 7, 2024
Co-authored-by: Manuel Pöter <manuel@arangodb.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Scope & Purpose
So far we would only special treat the SAN-environments for launched arangod instances, we want all subprocesses.
move handling out of instance.js into its own class
use this class inside of instance.js
deploy this class as well to
process-utilzs.js:executeAndWait()🍕 New feature
🔨 Refactoring/simplification
Backport 3.11 QA-536: move san file handling in its own class #20910