Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added GPython, Wonkey, NerdLang, RingLang, 4 BASICs, 5 Luas, 3 JSs, 1 Scheme, 1 Go, 3 Golang scripting-s #140

Conversation

vasilev
Copy link
Contributor

@vasilev vasilev commented Nov 30, 2023

Added GPython, Wonkey, NerdLang, RingLang,
BASIC section (basic_rs, basicwasm, EndBASIC, gobasic),
Luas (DCLua, go-lua, GopherLua, ofunc/lua, Pluto),
JavaScripts (Boa, goja, otto),
Schemes (Guile Hoot),
Golangs (Yaegi),
Golang scripting languages subsection (Anko, Risor, Tengo).

BASIC section (basic_rs, basicwasm, EndBASIC, gobasic),
Luas (DCLua, go-lua, GopherLua, ofunc/lua, Pluto),
Golang scripting languages subsection (Anko, Risor, Tengo).
@vasilev vasilev changed the title Added GPython, Wonkey, NerdLang, 4 BASICs, 5 Luas, 3 Golang scripting Added GPython, Wonkey, NerdLang, RingLang, 4 BASICs, 5 Luas, 1 Scheme, 3 Golang scripting-s Dec 1, 2023
@vasilev vasilev changed the title Added GPython, Wonkey, NerdLang, RingLang, 4 BASICs, 5 Luas, 1 Scheme, 3 Golang scripting-s Added GPython, Wonkey, NerdLang, RingLang, 4 BASICs, 5 Luas, 3 JSs, 1 Scheme, 1 Go, 3 Golang scripting-s Dec 11, 2023
@appcypher
Copy link
Owner

Thanks for the contribution although I would have preferred if you'd split this into multiple PRs.

So I see mention of alt language runtimes/compiler like gpython, boa, go-lua, otto etc. Have these been tested to compile to wasm? My skepticism is that language x (e.g. go) compiling to wasm doesn't mean all projects written in language x will compile to wasm. I just need to be sure since I can't test all these projects myself.

@vasilev
Copy link
Contributor Author

vasilev commented Jan 29, 2024

Thank you @appcypher for review.

I'll try to prepare a bunch of new PRs with proper proofs or explanations for each new item as soon as possible.

@vasilev
Copy link
Contributor Author

vasilev commented Feb 5, 2024

Closing this in favor of six new pull requests linked above (#143, #144, #145, #146, #147, #148).
All the items presented in this PR are mentioned in appropriate part.

@appcypher Could you please take a look at them?

@vasilev vasilev closed this Feb 5, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants