Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix:初始加载失败依旧加入懒加载列表,异步检查流程优化 #309

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

qdsordinarydream
Copy link
Contributor

@qdsordinarydream qdsordinarydream commented May 11, 2024

  1. 初始加载失败依旧加入懒加载列表

  2. 检查到存在通知,需要判断返回的结构做没有值的容错,在异步流程中,没有值的返回是异常的,应该在请求的时候就报错了
    image

  3. request 函数中,当只有一个节点可用的时候,直接返回,不然会造成客户端最多异常20min(等待下一次服务列表同步)
    image

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved handling of null configurations to prevent errors and ensure smoother updates.
    • Enhanced notification system to only update when there are actual configuration changes.
    • Added a validation to check node length before marking a node as down, enhancing the reliability of network operations.
  • Tests

    • Introduced a new test assertion to verify notification functionality accurately.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented May 11, 2024

Warning

Rate Limit Exceeded

@qdsordinarydream has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 14 minutes and 30 seconds before requesting another review.

How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.
Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.
Please see our FAQ for further information.

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between f859700 and c1728ac.

Walkthrough

The recent updates focus on enhancing robustness and reliability across various components. Changes include better handling of nil configurations, refined conditions for updating and notifying changes, and stricter checks before marking nodes as down. These adjustments aim to improve the system's fault tolerance and data integrity.

Changes

Files Summary of Changes
client.go Adjusted handling of nil apolloConfig, modified UpdateNotify value, and made conditional updates.
client_test.go Added a new assertion for GetNotify.
component/remote/async.go Added checks before updating notifications based on apolloConfig configurations.
protocol/http/request.go Added condition to check node length before setting a node as down.

Poem

🐇✨
In the land of code, where the bytes do hop,
A rabbit tweaked the flow, not a flop.
With a nibble here, a tinker there,
Ensured that bugs have no lair.
Oh, celebrate these changes, neat and fair! 🎉
🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented May 11, 2024

感谢您提出Pull Request,我会尽快Review。我会在1-2日内进行查看或者回复,如果遇到节假日可能会处理较慢,敬请谅解。

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Out of diff range and nitpick comments (1)
protocol/http/request.go (1)

Line range hint 74-76: Consider specifying MinVersion: tls.VersionTLS13 in the TLS configuration to ensure that only secure TLS versions are used. This enhances security, especially for public-facing applications.

- InsecureSkipVerify: insecureSkipVerify,
+ InsecureSkipVerify: insecureSkipVerify, MinVersion: tls.VersionTLS13
Review Details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9660dd0 and f859700.
Files selected for processing (4)
  • client.go (2 hunks)
  • client_test.go (1 hunks)
  • component/remote/async.go (1 hunks)
  • protocol/http/request.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (5)
component/remote/async.go (1)

86-88: The addition of a condition to check if apolloConfig.Configurations is not empty before updating notifications is a good practice. It prevents unnecessary updates and potential errors when there are no configurations to process.

protocol/http/request.go (1)

216-221: The addition of a condition to check the node length before setting a node down in single-node scenarios is a crucial improvement. It prevents erroneous behavior in systems with minimal node setups and enhances the robustness of the network error handling.

client.go (2)

167-168: Logging a warning when apolloConfig is nil is a good practice as it provides visibility into potential issues during configuration synchronization.


193-198: Updating the notification ID to -1 when apolloConfig is not present is a critical fix that ensures the system can handle initial load failures more gracefully by allowing for retries or appropriate handling later.

client_test.go (1)

415-415: Adding an assertion to check the GetNotify method of the NotificationsMap for a specific return value in the TestGetConfigAndInitValNil function is a good practice. It ensures that the method behaves as expected when queried with a non-existent key, enhancing the test coverage and robustness of the new error handling logic.

@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 9042914117

Details

  • 14 of 15 (93.33%) changed or added relevant lines in 3 files are covered.
  • 6 unchanged lines in 1 file lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage decreased (-0.3%) to 75.34%

Changes Missing Coverage Covered Lines Changed/Added Lines %
protocol/http/request.go 4 5 80.0%
Files with Coverage Reduction New Missed Lines %
protocol/http/request.go 6 66.67%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 8956224862: -0.3%
Covered Lines: 1329
Relevant Lines: 1764

💛 - Coveralls

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants