Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add option: maven.build.cache.forceRenew #137

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

zorglube
Copy link

Following this checklist to help us incorporate your
contribution quickly and easily:

  • Make sure there is a MBUILDCACHE JIRA issue filed
    for the change (usually before you start working on it). Trivial changes like typos do not
    require a JIRA issue. Your pull request should address just this issue, without
    pulling in other changes.
  • Each commit in the pull request should have a meaningful subject line and body.
  • Format the pull request title like [MBUILDCACHE-XXX] - Fixes bug in ApproximateQuantiles,
    where you replace MBUILDCACHE-XXX with the appropriate JIRA issue. Best practice
    is to use the JIRA issue title in the pull request title and in the first line of the
    commit message.
  • Write a pull request description that is detailed enough to understand what the pull request does, how, and why.
  • Run mvn clean verify to make sure basic checks pass. A more thorough check will
    be performed on your pull request automatically.
  • You have run the Core IT successfully.

If your pull request is about ~20 lines of code you don't need to sign an
Individual Contributor License Agreement if you are unsure
please ask on the developers list.

To make clear that you license your contribution under
the Apache License Version 2.0, January 2004
you have to acknowledge this by using the following check-box.

@AlexanderAshitkin
Copy link
Contributor

AlexanderAshitkin commented Apr 20, 2024

Hi @zorglube
You are likely looking for the maven.build.cache.skipCache property. If the property is set to true, the build doesn't use any of the cached artifacts but writes the results to the cache (if allowed by config), effectively achieving the forceRenew functionality.

@zorglube
Copy link
Author

zorglube commented Apr 20, 2024

Damn I didn't understood that.

Do you have any examples of the configuration needed to achieve that?

Still my idea is more "renew all the cache" than "rebuild all the results without using the cache".

@AlexanderAshitkin
Copy link
Contributor

AlexanderAshitkin commented Apr 21, 2024

Damn I didn't understood that.

Do you have any examples of the configuration needed to achieve that?

Still my idea is more "renew all the cache" than "rebuild all the results without using the cache".

If you use this option, it will be a "clean" build without using the cache, and everything will be re-uploaded to the server. Effectively, all the cache outputs will be replaced with fresh results - it is effectively a forceRenew option you're looking for. It has no config because it was considered an emergency option, not something permanently enabled. Usage is simple - -Dmaven.build.cache.skipCache=true on the command line.

@zorglube
Copy link
Author

Damn I didn't understood that.
Do you have any examples of the configuration needed to achieve that?
Still my idea is more "renew all the cache" than "rebuild all the results without using the cache".

If you use this option, it will be a "clean" build without using the cache, and everything will be re-uploaded to the server. Effectively, all the cache outputs will be replaced with fresh results - it is effectively a forceRenew option you're looking for. It has no config because it was considered an emergency option, not something permanently enabled. Usage is simple - -Dmaven.build.cache.skipCache=true on the command line.

Hello @AlexanderAshitkin,

I miss time nowadays, still I don't leave on the PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
2 participants