Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

IGNITE-20688 Fixed broken handles after binary object detached. #11272

Open
wants to merge 22 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

petrov-mg
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for submitting the pull request to the Apache Ignite.

In order to streamline the review of the contribution
we ask you to ensure the following steps have been taken:

The Contribution Checklist

  • There is a single JIRA ticket related to the pull request.
  • The web-link to the pull request is attached to the JIRA ticket.
  • The JIRA ticket has the Patch Available state.
  • The pull request body describes changes that have been made.
    The description explains WHAT and WHY was made instead of HOW.
  • The pull request title is treated as the final commit message.
    The following pattern must be used: IGNITE-XXXX Change summary where XXXX - number of JIRA issue.
  • A reviewer has been mentioned through the JIRA comments
    (see the Maintainers list)
  • The pull request has been checked by the Teamcity Bot and
    the green visa attached to the JIRA ticket (see TC.Bot: Check PR)

Notes

If you need any help, please email dev@ignite.apache.org or ask anу advice on http://asf.slack.com #ignite channel.

@petrov-mg petrov-mg force-pushed the IGNITE-20688 branch 2 times, most recently from 958161e to 58a1649 Compare March 11, 2024 15:22
@@ -179,6 +181,9 @@

BinaryMetadataMoveLegacyFolderTest.class,
BinaryContextPredefinedTypesTest.class,

RawBytesObjectReaderTest.class,
CrossObjetReferenceSerializationTest.class
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's add comma at the end of the line.


U.arrayCopy(arr, start, arr0, 0, len);
CrossObjectReferenceDetector detector = new CrossObjectReferenceDetector(BinaryHeapInputStream.create(arr, start));
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we use information about handles here as an additional hint?
For example:

  1. Pass to this (or new one) method some parameter like checkObjectReferences
  2. Only if this parameter is true analyze array by detector.
  3. Pass this parameter as false if handles is empty (if there are no handles, there can't be references to this handle)

In this case we can also revert changes to BinaryReaderExImpl.readObjectDetached, since, for root binary object, handles will always be empty.

}

/** */
public void readObject(BinaryOutputStream out) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's not a good name for this method (and following methods with BinaryOutputStream out parameter), perhaps something like copyObject is better.


if (isCrossObjRefDetected) {
try (BinaryOutputStream out = new BinaryHeapOutputStream(2 * len)) {
CrossObjectReferenceResolver resolver = new CrossObjectReferenceResolver(BinaryHeapInputStream.create(arr, start), out);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reuse the same BinaryHeapInputStream as for CrossObjectReferenceDetector?

import org.apache.ignite.internal.binary.streams.BinaryOutputStream;

/** */
public class RawBytesObjectReader implements BinaryPositionReadable {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

...BinaryObjectReader?

/** */
@RunWith(Parameterized.class)
@WithSystemProperty(key = IGNITE_BINARY_SORT_OBJECT_FIELDS, value = "true")
public class CrossObjetReferenceSerializationTest extends GridCommonAbstractTest {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Typo: CrossObjectReferenceSerializationTest


while (reader.position() < objDataEndPos) {
if (findInNextObject()) {
isFound = true;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks like is safe to return true; here (we don't rely on reader.position anywhere after returning true by this method)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants