New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
api,server: list autoscalevmgroups with keyword #9046
base: 4.19
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Fixes apache#9042 Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <abhishek.mrt22@gmail.com>
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## 4.19 #9046 +/- ##
============================================
- Coverage 14.96% 14.96% -0.01%
+ Complexity 10995 10992 -3
============================================
Files 5373 5373
Lines 469005 469009 +4
Branches 58953 58345 -608
============================================
- Hits 70198 70186 -12
- Misses 391036 391054 +18
+ Partials 7771 7769 -2
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
code lgtm
@shwstppr , did you test this? it seems strange that this would work as the DB does not have a field 'keyword'. I would expect a bit of code like
(stolen from ListAccounts) |
@DaanHoogland at line 1188, name field is used |
And I already added a screen recording of my testing in the description |
yes, so only the name is possible in a keyword search!? not state, min/max, etc; that is what I question. |
I have been reading the code again and I think we may choose to leave it at this , sorry to question @shwstppr . We may allow search for extra but this is at least sensible functionality. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
clgtm
@blueorangutan package |
@shwstppr a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el7 ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 9582 |
@blueorangutan test |
@DaanHoogland a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
[SF] Trillian Build Failed (tid-10213) |
@blueorangutan package |
@shwstppr a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el7 ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 9655 |
@blueorangutan test rocky8 kvm-rocky8 |
@weizhouapache a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (rocky8 mgmt + kvm-rocky8) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-10237)
|
@blueorangutan test alma9 kvm-alma9 |
@DaanHoogland a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (alma9 mgmt + kvm-alma9) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-10262)
|
@blueorangutan package |
@shwstppr a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el7 ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 9697 |
@blueorangutan test |
@shwstppr a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-10281)
|
Description
fixes #9042
Types of changes
Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity
Feature/Enhancement Scale
Bug Severity
Screenshots (if appropriate):
How Has This Been Tested?
fix-listvmautoscaling-search.mp4
How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?